So you don’t have any proof that you shot anywhere near 90° angle. gotcha
Also what do you care do those shells come back? There is no point really modeling shell fired at 89° angle at the sky. I know shells go past +10km so that is more then enough in case of WT for tanks.
This could go with my suggested “All Out War” game mode, that is yet to be approved by the mods. Idk if it’s been denied, but it would work perfectly in the proposed mode.
I prefer if someone scouts an enemy with drone, it will only share an estimated distance of 200m +/- off its target if beyond 1km away to SPH vehicles. Or if enemy is scouted by a scout vehicle’s binoculars then it would do the same. Now the info will show on the map and not on top of player’s tanks. A color (whatever color we choose) will show up on the map connecting you and the scouted enemy on the map with the distance measured. Distance measured will update every 5 seconds until the target no longer scouted.
To me this seems like a more simple way to SPH vehicles and the Type 75 MLRS for a barrage of rockets/HE rounds coming down on the designated area.
As you can see in this photo my main gun barrel was straight up now I sat there and waited for a round to drop back down and they were smoke rounds fired and no rounds never came back down nowhere, and they should have and they should have all around and in front of me!
Since you have a replay, you should follow the round and see what happens to it
1 Like
The idea would rely on having coordination between players which is asking too much in my opinion. The SL reward would certainly be low for someone, likely the spotter.
the M109 is mobile artillery and solely artillery, the soviet SU-76 in the war was used as both mobile artillery and anti-tank, the soviet Bm -8-24 is mobile artillery as is the Bm-13N, the German Brummbar is artillery, the calliope was used as mobile artillery, and the M8 HMC was a mobile motor which is a form of artillery. The G6 on the British Line as well as the British Matilda Hedgehog are both mobile artillery. Doesn’t matter what the roles gaijin has given them, their real-world role is artillery. And no matter how much you want to deny it, this game has mobile artillery units in it.
This is true but you cannot use them like artillery They are not Tank destroyers the way War Thunder has that listed thank you for your opinion you and I both know why we can’t use them as artillery pieces in this Game and it is not right on War Thunder part. This is one of their drummed-up examples of putting more junk in the game or units that cannot do what they’re supposed to do I have always said if you’re going to put something in the game make sure works like it’s supposed to not the way that you wanted to and calling it a tank destroyer is BS!!! In the picture I posted I waited in that spot to see where smoke rounds Fall and they never came down and hit the ground I figure they went into orbit Lol which is BS that we all know so on that point the way the game is because of the programming we will never be able to use them as artillery and this is wrong because of the programmers they don’t know what the hell they’re doing when it comes to programming artillery pieces into the game you know that’s one thing I got to say about WOT at least they got to know how to do it but why put something in the game that don’t work like it’s supposed to and that is the beef that I have with War thunder!
Would having an alternate aiming mode like WOT help facilitate what you are asking?
That’s essentially what he wants and we are all telling him no. A WOT system simply is one not gonna be fun to fight against and 2 you would be getting hit from however far the effective firing distance to the distance it can fire up to is. Which is the whole map. Aside from that he said this in a discussion rather than a suggestion meaning it’s being ignored.
I don’t want anything to do with World of Tanks and I don’t want it like World of Tanks you can’t bring a mobile artillery piece into a game and call a tank destroyer when it is not a tank destroyer this is what I’m saying and if you can’t see that from what I’ve written then you’re a kid that doesn’t know anything so grow up and do a little research because tank destroyers are not mobile artillery pieces and they shouldn’t have brought them into the game and less they were going to be allowed to be used like there’s supposed to be used
MTBs shouldnt have an artysupport. Light tanks and Flak yes, but realy not MBTs in the Toptiers…
I want to see some Arty in the game. Because of not available tanks i use in Hightierbattles Sturmtiger and others, but that cant be the solution in this game!
All artilleryvehicles are forced to direkt shot and hit like other tanks but… yeah, you know…
Thats not the “real” use of them.
They also should be there to destroy hidepositions or houses that the teammates can aim the enemy.
Ah yes the good ole days of world of rally tanks. As much as I enjoyed arty it just wouldn’t work here, current setup works for the gameplay/maps ect. Carl’s would find a way to abuse it and that in turn would cause more harm than good. Just my opinion.
Oh, I know how to read. However, what you wrote is incomprehensible. I am positive several of us were taking bits and pieces of the essay grade paragraphs you wrote just to figure it out. I also close my case given you rather just insult a person.
You insulted me! So go back to school
Read the joke. You wrote a paragraph that no one entirely could understand. If you think of something that could be added give us a straight-to-the-point, not a college-grade essay.
They were added because players wanted them added. Sure they cant do their built purpose but honestly, when was the last time you saw players using their vehicles as that vehicles doctrine suggested?
I’ll give you this one. There’s probably been 1 or 3 times at best where I’ve seen people use their vehicles to their historical job titles. Only pushing up once it was primarily clear.
The whole point I’m trying to make is why put something in the game that can’t be used for what it is intended to be used for and call it something that it is not? And call it a tank destroyer when it’s not that’s the whole point it was stupid for them to call it a tank destroyer when it’s not seeing what I’m getting at here is a picture of a tank destroyer and here is a picture of a mobile artillery piece
OK one of these has light armor can you guess which one LOL that cannot go up against Tanks on the battlefield it has to stay in the rear area or will be taken out and lose it!