Mitsubishi F-2

I know about the seeker but in my experience preflaring still works against radar slaved FoV IRCCM? It’s only after launch the FoV reduces if I remember correctly so you’re safe until you run out of flares

I’ve been turnfighting (against my better judgement) in my F-15J(M) and it’s pretty common amongst other people not participating in BVR and trying to sneak around.

That being said, the only people you are at a disadvantage against are the people at the start who are at high altitude doing BVR, but if you’re already notching by flanking, those people ignore you for other better targets

I wouldn’t say it’s not bad, it’s adequate. It still has AESA radar which has really good locking and tracking capability to take advantage of datalink.

I don’t disagree

And four ARHs. Strangely enough, it is treated as a 120B class. How does it compare to the C-5 or the C-7 that will appear?

There is no delay for IRCCM activation, according to missile stats spreadsheet. Also, on MM2 IRCCM suppose to activate right after lock, not even launch. Not sure about last, tho. There was update with this, but no visual indication.

I don’t see that? I see some people try to flank, but they don’t go into turnfight. They just don’t want to go into missile hell.

And these people usually know how to play. How to notch, how to use missiles. Not only they have better position, they also know how to use it.

I played on F/A-18C Late and it’s TERRIBLE at BVR. Too slow, too bad acceleration, too much energy bleeding. F-2 should be better in terms of flight performance (not much tho), but has very limited amount of missiles. You can’t really use your datalink, because in notch you lose enemy lock, and then DL doesn’t work.

2 Likes

It’s possible, but I’ve yet to be hit with one yet even through radar lock with ample pre-flaring but who knows

Which is fair enough, neither will the F-2 want that so we should naturally run into those folks

Which is like what you meant though, about:

I think the big advantage is against other people who are notching. It’ll be harder for them to notch your radar with its fast sweep and constant tracking, which will help the AAM-4 still use DL to find its mark even when the AAM-4 can’t see the target

I guess that’s also something. F-18C has so many missiles and yet it’s not as strong in BVR thanks to its flight performance. F-2 I’d say is somewhere in the middle

It’s enough for me to watch how tournament champions play on it

All FoV IRCCMs have a narrower field of view after seeker lock, not after launch.

1 Like

The ASM-2 appears to have a lid on the intake, which I believe will separate after launch. Does anyone have any images or other information?
Also, in the video at the URL I mentioned, it seems to fly lower in the air with less smoke and better hit accuracy than DevServer’s ASM-2. What do you guys think?

1 Like

Dev server ASM-2 (as well as ASM-1) is literally AS. 34 Kormoran copy. Also sea scimming/ terrain following is not in the game at the moment so it shares trajectory with regular AGMs

1 Like

I think that music got me acting up
IMG_6689

1 Like

Everyone’s afraid that the F-2 will not be great or even DOA, I dare to disagree. I’ve been using my F-15J(M) with 4x AAM-4 and 4x AMM-3 since I got it and it’s absolutely fine.

Before Typhoons and F-15Es, I would climb, launch my AAM-4s at 40-50 kms, get a few kills, and then dive and use my AAM-3s at closer ranges. I still do that in downtiers. Of course Typhoons and F-15Es outclimb you easily so I don’t climb as often when against 14.0 and preserve my AAM-4s for closer ranges where they are also superior to AMRAAMs due to the AAM-4s instantenous pull right of the rail.

I expect the F-2 to play similarly as I described with the added bonus of being able to dogfight (as rare as it happens) Typhoons and Rafales much easily than with the F-15J(M).

4 Likes

Thanks for the reply.
Do you know of any sources or other information that might tell us about the lid and separation of the ASM-2 intake?

1 Like

serious videos trying not to have amazing music challenge: impossible

1 Like

Yea, I’ve also been running 4/4 and have had similar experiences. Though with F-2, I’ll be running 2/4 as it’s the classic ace combat look

So dev server is now closed and we never got to test the IR ASM-2 nor we got answer about it being capable of locking on tanks…
Pretty dissapointing

1 Like

Dev blogs simply states for naval targets so i doubt it

Tho ASM-1 was able to hit tanks with help from radar but idk.

1 Like

If you can find smb who’s just going into notch without launching missile into the enemy… In a 1v1 situation usually it’s you launch missile, your enemy launch missile, you both go into notch, then repeat. Until smb run out of missiles or make a mistake.

I think on F-2 you shoud not go into BVR at all. You need to flank, go into more close fight and use your slow speed and 14G overload for fast defense when you and your enemy trade your missiles.

So, you base your opinion about kfir on a gameplay of top players? It’s so… “Unbiased”. By definition they can perform better on it. It’s like watching Smigol videos of how he goes into dogfight on bombers and think, that everyone can do this and perform like him. I don’t even mention, that if you watching videos, these players can simply include only good battles. Also, if you count all good players in AS tournaments it’s gonna be, like, FIFTY of them? For the whole game.

ASM-1s track any moving target on ground and water, but they are super unreliable on tanks, loosing lock and missing 90% of the time, the idea for the ASM-2s IR to work on tnaks its to have a reliable lock that would track until the end

1 Like

It will depend entirely if they wish to allow its IR seeker to find and hit tanks

1 Like

Yeah, im just dissaponited that the dev server ended and we never got to know for sure, and that being the only thing keeping me from preordering the ADTW

1 Like

Im curious if maybe sniper pod could help but i dont think ASM-2 can be slaved by the pod

1 Like