Ah, I thought it was only on the kfir C.10 irl but not implemented, mb
Are the 2 inner pylons not able to carry JDAMs?
Fuel dumping works only on F-111A, I guess
1 Like
Yeah I think so too, for now, but many other jets will probably get it too
j-10 doesn’t win against blk 10 or gripen
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hQX9V3yYZmc1
ASM-2 isnt currently correct, bug report has been made
4 Likes
Now that the 120C-5 is added will the AAM-4’s on the F-2 and others get fixed soon?
So now that the US has the AIM120C, can we argue that Japan get rhe AAM-4B?
5 Likes
same motor. Honestly I have no clue why the AIM-120C is here, maybe just for tests??? idk.
maybe un-nerfed AAM-4/PL-12/MICA/etc will come too???
oh hey Gaijin Entertainment look proof the GCS-1 CAN track tanks. And even better ITS IN ENGLISH
why cant the F-2A introduce the GCS-1 also?
2 Likes
Can you provide direct source of this image? I’ve seen information that this picture is from presentation of thermal or smth. But not GCS-1. Also, distance is only 1.8 km. Really-really small
Just tested the asm-1s on a custom battle with tank bots from 9.7 to 12.0.
They do kill mbts on direct hit, but it only tracks moving targuets, and if there are 2 together. It doent know who to follow, so getting them to hit its way too random, specially at longer distances
They can be shot from 14-15km, which is the spawn distance for CAS
I hope they fix the ASM-2 IR seeker soon so i can test that one
3 Likes
Why can the premium version carry more than the tech tree???
edit: I’ll put it in the dev server section probably a bug / they removed it so they probably already know
7 Likes
We might actually get naval groups to use our ASMs in ARB
Carrier Groups in maps
1 Like
Yes, and add 6 unfounded ASMs. No one notices it, including the moderators.
ASMs are not AAM-4s.
What are you talking about lol If the AAM-4 is not allowed, then neither will the six ASM-1/2 be allowed. That is already ahistoric.
Are the ASM-1 stats correct?
I was reading the suggestion and it says the explosive mass should be higher
Speed is correct acording to the suggestion
The electrical connections for an ARH missile like an AAM-4 are not the same as the connections required for an ASM-1/2, simply put.
The photos taken show that the pylons can have the missiles on them as is, the problem/concern for a real life mission would be range, hence why they usually have fuel tanks on those points. However, it does appear that missiles CAN be carried on the pylons at the cost of range.
1 Like