I was going to ask if anyone could get more data on F-2 just so we have an objective baseline, but what Percussion has seems like a good start, but more data is always good
Personally, I’m more interested in low speed turn data, though up to mach 1.0 is also useful
It doesn’t have the F-2 in the database but I can still get the real time values on my screen overlay while playing. Using RTSS ofcourse.
JAS-39 has 2 less AAMs while having similar flight performance.
J-10 has [marginally] worse flight performance.
F-15s are under-BR’d.
Su-27SM has a weak radar.
The J-10 has better loadout and radar though, its one of the best 13.7s
ASM-2 is IR
hey so for anyone wondering on the dev server you do get 2 stock AAM4s they are on the third pylons from the wingtips
what stuff is stock?
bombs and 2x AAM3 and 2x AAM4
Ooooo thank you :D
One report of the countermeasures was accepted and the extra AAM-4 one got rejected for “it’s not a proof that it can use AAM4.”.
I wanted to try the ASM-2s but they are not IR yet, the penetration looks pretty low compared to SAP AGM65s, and TNT is lower than KH38s, so i wonder how it wold do against tanks
Max instructor turn at about 400kph IAS you get nearly 20º/s which is great. The AJ will do 19-19.5 IIRC (The AJ in max instructor turn will get slower in the 370kph ish and about 18º/s)
At 500kph you getting nearly 22deg/s sustained.
Its hard for me to test at higher speeds because I’m test driving the TT F-2 without having the jet unlocked with a good crew. But its not on typhoon levels of sustained turn rate, maybe similar to the rafale or a gripen.
When you are going like 900kph IAS and do a max turn, you can sustain 30deg/s for a very “long” time and you wont drop your speed much.
Later today, might try to see if my nvidia overlay can capture the WTRTI overlay over the game, if not, I can’t be bothered to make a video.
Ah that’s rough
Sounds about right from how it felt
This is what I was looking for and it looks promising
Overall sounds good, thank you. I look forward to see more data, esp with any FM changes that may or may not come
Were these all clean and at min fuel or?
gaijin denying GCS-1 for “no proof it can track tanks” meanwhile us the community sending public info proving it can
ah double standards like always from gaijin. SU-30SM with double rail and R-77-1 never seen but it’s ok… this game gotten really worse
@Smin1080p_WT
Why the developers are doing this? So many fanatsy loadouts, especially for russia for modern air stuff. but for other nations isn’t ok to do that? And here it is a balancing not powercreeping like otherthings.
russian based company giving bias to russia
seems ligit
Yes, close to the deck, in the israeli map, different maps have different air temps so results might differ a little bit.
And having the Kh38mt track tanks based on nothing but Gaijin’s fantasy
Penguin ASM tracking tanks??? who would have thought an anti ship missile tracks tanks
If they do things right with the ASM-2s, they could be like japanese equivalent to the KH38s, I’m not sure about the damage since they have less TNT and less pen
