It would be from Japan if it exists. English speaking explicit sources won’t have much cause it’s not an export aircraft to begin with, and those are wet pylons so they’re of course going to have fuel tanks most of the time.
Though there are images that could be seen as very convincing they’re capable of equipping the weapons.
There is no source for six ARH. The only way to get to the six ARH conclusion is by comparing close up pictures of the main pylons.
And before I’ve to repeat myself; all six most inner pylons seem to have the very same electrical specifications. We figured this out last year already.
I mean, chances are DMM did the research here instead of Gaijin. Stuff like the inner pylons using what appears to be MRM rails is something so specific that it seems more similar to the other niche Japanese info DMM has gotten for some vehicles in the past.
This also gives me hope for things like the Shimadzu HMD (that even on the forum was only found less than a day ago) and detailed flight model.
We have close up pictures, we do have documents and even requested some starting two years ago - also declassified.
Not much is crazy stuff, but I just want to point that some people here know very well what they are talking about. Even when it comes to the performance of the AAM-4.
If it gets ARH doesn’t it have to be J/APG-2? I thought the aircraft fitted with J/APG-1 lacker the DL-Transmitter (forgot what it’s called) to support ARH missiles