Which is theoretically possible…as far as im concerned unlike the Phantom…the Eagle (J) did not have its bombing computer removed or anything that would prevent it from using those GBUs the F-15A has.
Yea, but AFAIK reports of it got denied so it’s unfortunate.
1 Like
Still open (the only report I am aware of)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/qt6xX8It7qAC
1 Like
Oh wow. Not sure if a tech mod needs to get pinged to get some attention to it?
Perhaps
2 Likes
F-15 is AIM-9M compatible. What militaries purchase doesn’t mean equipment in-game cannot have what they’re capable of using as per their manual.
did that internal radar report about TWS get thrown in the trash or what
1 Like
If it can be used according to the manual, the DM43 could be added to the Leo2 series and the Type 90. Isn’t DM43 removed from Leo2A5 because it is not deployed? If not, then there would be no need to remove DM53 when it was implemented.
Can add past shells that can be used on Soviet tanks as well.
Could add GBU-8 to F-15J as well.
There is no evidence that the F-4EJ deploys the AIM-7D. This is acknowledged in the issue but ignored.
Leo 2A5 never got DM43 in WT.
I support it getting DM43, just as I support every 12.0+ tank that uses the RH120 of at least Ariete and newer getting SHARD.
I want the NATO standard utilized.
All 7D requires is a CW Illuminator, which EJ has sadly.
Are you sure about that?
Okay that’s weird…
Had to have been less than a month cause 2A5 was very much using DM53 long before 2PL became unlockable.
Leo 2PL was added in the “Ixwa Strike” on March 10, 2021. At that time, it was DM33 and DM23.
On July 13, 2021, the server update removed DM23 from Leo 2A5 and Leo 2PL and replaced it with DM33 and DM43.
On December 2, 2021, the server update removed DM43 from Leo 2A5 and added DM53.
You are wrong and your theory would be inconsistent. If there is an example of gaijin removing ammunition that is not deployed, the F-15J has also received one nerf that requires one more study than the F-15A if the AIM-9M is not removed.
1 Like
@_David_Bowie There were talks about ant internal report for APG-63 PSP for F-15J since last update, as well as a public bug report being acknowledged about it. Any update on this since then?
2 Likes
2 Likes
No, it’s still open.
1 Like
Ah, I see.
Is there any difference that we’ll see between PSP or not in WT? If so, is it a case of not enough information or just low priority for it still being open?
1 Like
lmao they closed it and did nothing just as usual
they still even haven’t fixed the bugged FOV for the AAM-3 that has been there since it was introduced but I guess it’s just a detail and they don’t have time for that
At this point its too be expected sadly, its the same story for the Type 10 and its CVT. Just bite the bullet and make a suggestion, better than doing nothing and waiting forever…
5 Likes