Mirage IIIe back to 10.3

3 missiles vs 4… In that logic, the R3R is irrelevant. I much prefer the Magic 1 to the R-60 due to its ridiculous acceleration and superior maneuverability. As for the R530, if used correctly its a kill most of the time, however sometimes people will just dodge it or chaff it, of which the R3R on the SMT has the same fate.

As for energy recovery, that is a problem with every mirage, but the 21SMT will bleed its energy faster (At least I think so). Energy recovery in ARB is very important as you have said, and so both planes are better than the other in some scenarios. However, the IIIE at 10.7 opposed to 10.3 is still useable, its not like the plane is completely useless at its BR? It’s not broken overpowered, just average or maybe slightly below.

The A-10 actually feels lighter and turns better lmao

no because the 530 does not matter as i said.

It’s probably why I never brought it up, right?

No.

No, its a mirage 3E for * sake…

I’m still struggling with one major point. If there are planes at BR 10.3 that are just as good or even better, then what justifies putting the Mirage IIIE at 10.7?

the J7D being under BR’d af at 10.7 as well

the F8U2 is worse overall.
the Mig21 SMT and MF are A symetrical they are overall about on par with it

the IIIS should get aim 9 P - 5’s which are 9M equivelants.

No it shouldn’t get aim9j’s thats totally false.

It should get aim9 p -4’s which are 9L equivelants and -5s which are the 9M equivelant

@Schindibee is that right?

what 10.3 is better than it 'xD the 3E is fantastic for its BR tbh id much rather it over most if not all the other 10.7s ive used.
which is almost 8 nations worth of planes.

In terms of seeker performance you’re more or less correct. However, they still use the basic 9P missile frame, which is in of itself just an export 9J.

1 Like