Have you played 11.7 without RWR?
I don’t really know how it performs, so I don’t know if 12.0 or 11.7 is better for it.
1 Like
if they did that and buffed the rwr yeah but the rwr is one of the worst in the game
You mean the magic 1s you have to get onto someone’s tail, within 1km, for it to effectively track? Let alone reject flares.
always. it is useless and eyeballs are actually better. you can ping someone when you are not indending to attack them and the people with rwr will panic and go in defense lmao.
not a problem when you ignore the rwr.
then maybe you should not be taking part in these arguments
it will still be ass no matter how good the seeker is due to flight dynamics
Do you have anything to back that up or are you just going to say it.
what makes you think this missile was somehow a good missile in real life in the time it existed compared to its counterparts?
The 530F flies fine, its just slightly picky on its range is all, the falling-for-first-chaff is the issue
if you think that is a problem then you can agree the r60m should also be buffed because it falls for the first flare
So you’re comparing a radar-guided missile at 12.0 to an IR-guided missile that pulls considerably harder at 10.7?
are you seriously comparing sarhs and fox-2s
2 Likes
its the same logic, if something should be improved because they fall for first chaff then the same should be done with missiles that fall for the first flare. battleratings dont matter here.
Not to mention the flare rejection of R60 at any range outside point blank is dubious, at best. Complete fantasy on most counts.
But mate insists that a 20g missile that should have chaff rejection, according to a myriad of documents, is a bad missile. So who knows.
3 Likes
no person has a problem dodging a 20g missile if they try, especially from front. if they dont try to dodge they also aren’t going to be dropping chaff so youd hit it with the current model too. there will be no increase in effectiveness.
That seems like an incredibly bad idea.
I was not discussing its BR, but I was asking about it’s RWR in order to see if the claim that it’s worse than the Mig-23s is true. Then you come and say that IFF isn’t important and then claim that RWR isn’t helpful.
So you should have no issue bringing the missile up to parity with available documentation.
Its not the same logic. One’s at a lower BR, doesn’t require a constant radar lock, doesn’t set off any RWRs, and is at 10.7, and doesn’t include IRCCM
One of them is at 12.0, methods to filter chaff, pulls less, requires a radar lock. Of course 530F should have SOME chaff res, R60M has nothing to do with that
“rwr is helpful” i can lock you and scare you and make you change your plans but a person who ignores rwr wont have that problem
Wow, this guy will be astounded when he learns of the concept of situational awareness.
4 Likes
are you actually joking