That’s true, the Tiger HAD however should be a bit better however since it can just only show the opticals while scanning the battlefield while the A129D has to show the entire hull, exposing it to SAMs.
And it’s all good. Also yes, I’ve been advocating for Israel to get it as well.
Me no happy >:<
See if you guys can wander over there and give the thread a like.
The AH-129D will be better against fixed wings because of the rotary cannon, which will be better than an AT 30mm, thats about it, so i’d say the difference is negligible.
With the upcoming HMD for the F-16C’s i wonder if Mirage 2000 and Mig 29 will get their equivilants, i wonder if we can get the TopSight for the mirage 2000 (atleast the 5F)
isnt it the same 30mm that the normal HAD/HAP uses? with 27mm at 10m 0 degrees SAPHEI?
Competent people are already working on it
how you know?
They told me directly, a report should come soon or already has been made i talked with the reporters yesterday.
Have reports/discussions also being made on the fact that French missiles and plane don’t appear to have the new range indicators of missiles that was added on US and Russian aircraft’s giving more accurate min and max ranges when slaved to radar ?
Dunno about that but for now priroties aren’t located on these fields if you want more info @DirectSupport might answer your questions better than i can.
They have the same rate of fire at 750 RPM, so Tiger is better. A129 should have selectable 1250 rpm though.
AH-129D uses M197 (20x102 mm) while M781 from HAD uses 30x113 mm designed to engage light armored vehicle and soldier (precision rocket aceuleus and AGM being there to engage heavy armor)
Btw as a reminder the DEFA from the mirage family are also using 30x113 ammo but it is no compatible with the 30x113 of the M781
can the 5F carry exocet? How many can the Etendard IV M, and Super Etendard carry?
I don’t believe the 5F or Etendard IV variant in-game can carry it. The SEM should be able to carry two, but I believe that carrying 1 was the standard procedure.
That’s not a Mirage 5F (If we got a Mirage 50 variant, that could also carry it), that’s a Mirage 2000. If we got an Exocet on the Mirage 2000 series, we should get the AM39 variant of the Exocet as well rather than the older one.
I wasn’t reading close I just assumed because its the 2000 thread you were just paraphrasing
Ah I see what you mean. Was ambiguous of a question I suppose given the overlap.
Mirage 2000-5F mk2 was developped and is able to carry at least 1 Exocet in centerline pylon.
The Photo of @Macekeeks showed you, is a Mirage 2000 (and told by the painted name of the aircraft on the nose)
The Super-Etendard can carry 1 Exocet, with Fuel tank on the other side.
Etendard IVM never used AM.39, it used AS.20 then AS.30 as Anti-ship weapon.
