it’s still pretty overpowered in mid altitude speed, Gaijin still can’t modelled pylon drag properly, so Mirage 2000 will still be good, at least up until everyone got Rafale lol.
Don’t forget how Muti-Dart still has no CCIP despite other rockets having CCIP on the jaguar. Wouldn’t even hard to model it, games have shotgun reticles since the 80s…
1 Like
So how many AASMs could RMV take? 6?
4 I think. 2 under the fuselage, one on each wing (since we don’t have proof for AUF2 dual carry for wing Mirage 2000s)
i hope they fix god damn micas… range and wobble
2 Likes
I found some photos that may prove it can take 6-8 AASMs? but I am not an expert, just google that.
I’m really not sure as to what would be the layout bf. This îcture is just dummy, not even practice bombs so I’ll take it with a bit of care
That’s a 2000N used by the DGA, this loadout was used once to test the flight performance with the maximum loadout (dummy here as vizender said), the only AASM shot with a Mirage 2000 were shot with this same plane and were carried on the center pylon
they sound amazing
Good morning Mirage 2000 enjoyers, here is a bug report to add the GBU-22 currently on the Rafale on the Mirage 2000D RMV
6 Likes
@WaretaGarasu Hey is there any chance that Mirage 4000 would receive its historical chaff? Currently it’s still passed as suggestion. I’m fine if Gaijin would consider increase its BR if it got its historical chaff. France still had the 13.0 Belgian F-16.
More chaffs wouldn’t make it better enough to make it a 13.0
2 Likes
For me, more chaff especially large calibre chaff really makes the aircraft pretty much invincible to Fox 3 spam in the early game.
Well of course in the end this is my opinion. If Gaijin decided to still keep the suggestion, well I can’t argue no more.
Having large Chaffs is still situationnal, even if it’s better for decoying Fox-3.
Most of the time, Fox-3 kills me only when i was 5km head-on to my ennemy, and i do use only Light Chaffs, (so, there is pilots errors on my side) and good chaff use make the difference ^^"
1 Like
well well well
5 Likes
it looks really good
Now we need the gbu-22 and the plane is complete. (for now)
well the thing about the mirage 2000 series and AASM is, that the only Mirage 2000 version the AASM was tested on was 2000N (if i remember correctly), but i guess gaijin went with “well D is developed from N, therefore it can carry it”
I mean if its theoretical and Is possible. Other than that, i hope they give ut the 22s as they were used on It, for the MICAs i dont think its the right time, i just dont want to see the same treatment of the 29s = (not adding MICA IR for balance and giving It a lower br) for both the 2000s.
The plane is horrible honestly. He could have come out 2/3 years ago in this state and it wouldn’t have changed anything.