[DEV] Mirage 2000D RMV missing radar mode // Gaijin.net // Issues
You didn’t attached the source
The source is a book that I don’t currently have with me, I take the quote from the notes I had taken while inquiring about the radar, I will see if I can get hold of this book again
For forwarding the report the source source (cover and relevant page) is needed. I will put the report on-hold so you will have the time to find it.
1 Like
Quick question, I just found the book in digital format but I will probably have to buy it, is the source considered a primary source? Just so I don’t buy it for nothing
Spoiler
1 Like
Published by Armèe de l’air. Yes
I just tested the M2000 chaff and it was changed to 2 pops instead of 1 pop.
Mirage 2000 Chaff from ICD is 2 pops while from everything else is 1 pops.
I’ll see if I’m going to buy it, the problem is that I currently have a lot of sources but none of them give identical information, the only thing that is more or less certain is that the air-to-air capacity is very poor on the original version (the plane would have trouble finding a KC-135 at more than 5nm) so I’m not sure of the relevance of what I can say.
The radar would have been improved many times but the documents are confidential and I have no information apart from their names (Antilope 5, 5-3C, 53C, 53C/D, 5-3D, 50 and 5 TC)
1 Like
For the moment the radar is missing A-G Modes as well, while it is WIP it can be reported. Basic A-A Modes (ACM and SRC) is here.
1 Like
Is there any chance of getting chaff back to 1 pop?
Basic A-A Modes (ACM and SRC) is here.
what? i just test flew both D R-1 and D RMV and the only thing they have access to is A2G search and A-A ACM
1 Like
SRC mode is surprising so far, it allows you to find moving tanks and boats
Well you are correct apologies, just checked now
1 Like
@WaretaGarasu i guess it’s you that put my report fixed. Do you need me to make another report for the 5F and 5EI ? Or is it already good internally ?
Already done.
1 Like
reports about what?
5F and 5EI counter measures are still slightly incorrect
1 Like