https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/X6LWvcluyrqQ
This report is passed as a bug AFAIK so I did not bother remaking it (since I would have added nothing of value). Wareta told us that he nudged the report in the FTTR discord
opps i already have hit the i have the same issue button, but thanmk you
However you won’t get the fox3 range as there is no data link. RMV is limited to the range of the ir seeker of the mica ir
I loudly cry in my s4
Yeah uhh i dont think m2kd rmv had it irl or had it the last time i test drove it lol
It has it since beginning of dev.
I would guess that the 5F will receive complete HMD. As for the RMV, I would not be surprised if keep it. Either because as a MICA carrier (which is unlikely, since I would hope EL are removed with radar change, and I don’t think IR are coming anytime soon), or to differentiate it from the 5F.
Just like the 5F, there is no proof that the D-RMV carries HMD. Although, I have read here and there that some think that it does carry Scorpion from photographs of some of the pilots helmet. I don’t think it’s likely tho.
I believe it’s TopOwl in dev not scorpion. If it was Scorpion you’d have the same Friend or Foe Identification as the A10C
Now the RMV can identify friendly vehicles and aircraft.
I don’t know yet if this will be changed in the official update, but if it will be changed to an antelope radar, I will be glad to have this feature.
You can literally see it has the SADL IFF in the picture (circles around the friendly aircrafts).
As a sidenote, F-16C was bug reported to be miasing SADL, and it was shot down by gaijin saying it “wasnt in the game” (despite the bug report literally pointing out it was in fact in the game, on the A-10C)
My bad I was on the previous dev update where I’m pretty sure it did not have it
correct CM for 2000d series now.MICA-EM removed and Air BR still 13.7:(
other m2k no change
I want ask some of you,why dont just let’em hold the MICA-EM and wait for MICA-IR
That’s absolutely garbage…
And yet it kept 13.7.
HAMMER, NOW
This is still dev server. BR is subject to change.
As of now, HMD is still here, so I guess it’s here to stay.
As for AASM, I guess it wasn’t in their plans to add it on the RMV initially. Maybe they might give it them since it does not have MICA anymore, but that depends if they have time to implement it, since they need to model it and find informations on it’s performances. Either way, it’s certain that the mirage will go now in BR in the current situation.
Usually BR are not changed during dev server but are for live.
All good, just wanted to bring your attention to it, sorry if I came off a bit cross.
Personally, I don’t think AASM Hammer should be added, nor do i think Kh-38M should remain as a weapon that can be used in GFRB. Weapons that not only outrange everything currently in-game, but everything that could be player controlled in the future as well should not be added to GFRB, it just makes ground players unwilling victims and is bad for gameplay imo.
That being said, I can understand the complaints of russians having a standoff weapon like the Kh-38 while nobody else does.
Oh thats good news, they changed it then.
The issue is not that the weapons outrange any system it’s that the render distance at whicch you can lock on a target is 20km. At this distance only the pantsir is able to hit. At the same time the only nations that have a 20km+ weapon that is sure of hitting as such distances is… Russia and soon UK with Brimstones but Russians have FnF weapons for those ranges while brimstones are laser guided. S obasically the issue lies in the fact the only AA that can intercept long range AGM users is Russian and the best AGM is Russian at the same time. The real solution to this problem would be to increase player vehicles render distance but also add multi vehicles AA systems able to hit at long ranges. But in any way AA VS planes is going to be incredibly hard to balance in top tier.
Would 2 MICA IR combined with a gunpod really be as gamebreaking as people make them out to be?
Many of the modern missiles were having issues upon introduction or were either nerfed or buffed after a while.
At 13.7 2 MICA IR should be acceptable. There likely is some leeway regarding it’s specifications, due to classified information anyway.