Report was already made for that, it is just up to Gaijin to have this modeled for now
7 Likes
Don’t forget the non-existant loft. Even Derby outranges it now.
I agree remove all Air-to-Ground armament, and included Thales Damocles targeting pod
MICA-IR replace Magic II & Super 530F. but increase BR to 14.0 ?
If they do lets hope they give us a replacement for cas if that’s a one off Mirage 2000 testing AASM or a Rafale in less than 4 updates
2 Likes
You know Gaijin wont give us a replacement even they remove the A2G right?Its a bad ieda
About the MICA IR, i think we should get a late variant of the 2000-5F, because some space will be necessary between thoses that don’t have any IIR missiles, that are unflarable, and thoses that have it. In the long run it would be better to have the current one at 13.7 without the MICA IR and a late one at 14.0 with the MICA IR added. In this case, more content is always better.
it’s also because China, thanks to Taiwan, should also get one without the MICA IR, they never used them.
There is also my air arcade point of view, where you need a good lineup of planes, not just one. Because of the lower number of differents airframes, getting more variants would be necessary to keep up with others trees that have a higher number of different airframes ( like the US with F-16, F-15, AV-8B and F/A-18 that will come soon ). In that matter, the F1MF2000 and either a Rafale or another 2000-5 would be necessary to keep up in the firsts months of 2025.
1 Like
We could see a replacement pretty quick since we have the 2000D model they could just give us the 2000D r2 which would open up a lot of capabilities which was suggested a long time ago by @DirectSupport without having to model a new airframe
the thing is it’s not multi role, while there is F-16s with A2G and Fox 3. it’s a 2000-5 mk2 or -9 that will be necessary if the 2000-5F lose its A2G weaponry.
Which works exceptionally well in the mirage lol
I dont think Gaijin can give these things pretty quick bro.Think of what we’ve lost.Countermeasures?FM?They give these back?No.Nothing at all
I don’t think it should be removed but if they do we have a lot of options I’m just trying to look on the bright side.
well they denied the report the first time so it will probs not end up mattering
Barak II used to be lovely.
Oh please no!
Early Rafale can fit that spot.
Regarding your lineup -9 would probably the best.
Even if they don’t, the plane is ahistorical as it is with the current air to ground loadouts. We can’t be advocating for unrealistic air to ground loadouts.
2 Likes
It can carry 6x MICA IR, so probably considerably more than 14.0.
Yeah this is something worth discussing. The addition of 6x MICA IR will continue to increase the aircraft’s BR.
There is now more news showing that used Rafales from French service are being sold off to other countries and Rafales currently being produced are slated for other countries due to a backlog of orders. Because of this, MICA NGs may be introduced onto the current Mirage 2000-5Fs in French service. So that may be another set of missiles which would increase the aircraft’s BR.
4 Likes
Carries 6x MICA-IR like MICA-EM ?
But I need gajin remove Super 530
BR 14.3 ?
-9 would be premium
Early Rafale F.1 (M type) is not having those MICA-IR, but Magic-II instead.
Yes
Who knows. We’ll have to see first where the Mirage 2000-5F will end up after they fix the countermeasures, radars, HMD bug, and after they fix the MICA EM more. It may end up being 14.3 in the future without MICA IR even being added.