Mirage 2000 Thread : Variants, performance, characteristics and sources

IMG_1499
Cant wait to demolish those Airfield campers with 6 MICA missiles.

12 Likes

Can’t wait to demolish these R27er enjoyer in custom.

Oh im gonna nuke them in Air Rb.

Those Su-27’s and Mig-29’s ruled the high altitude for so long, time to change the game.

5 Likes

You should check up more from this thread, there’s a lot of effort from these community to make Mirage 2000 competitive in a top tier match. It’s a remarkable effort really sorting out all these documents.

Because, I don’t really mean to brag about this community, but here we are the player who really wanted to improve the nuance of the gameplay.

Would add, that Taiwan never bought/recieved MICA-IR missile in difference from french -5F

Perhaps I shouldn’t speculate that Gaijin would treat the Mirage 2000 in the same malicious way they treat the Leclerc, but I’ve indeed suffered a lot on the Leclerc. There are many players like you who have tried to get Gaijin to restore the performance of the Leclerc, but they failed. Gaijin is more willing to copy and paste the Leopard 2 for the French Army tech tree. They are indifferent to our Leclerc issues, even calling the facts NOT A BUG.
I fully acknowledge your efforts to restore the performance of the Mirage 2000. I just lack trust in Gaijin’s attitude towards France.

2 Likes

images (2)

2 Likes

Is that for me or for the people who camps AF 24/7?

they-them : )

1 Like

Well i dont think that will be enough for them xD

Idk why y’all worried about demolishing the R-27ER folks, especially in customs… there are other FOX-3s and Russian planes with 90° gimbal radars to worry about.

Also, @DirectSupport you said the missile caliber was too large. Reducing it would adversely effect the drag calculations and we may see a detrimental impact on performance based on the correction. Would be nice to test the dev server model in the same scenario as the corrected one.

Of course this is assuming they don’t change the CxK and other values as well.

1 Like

Should be 85° for the 29SMT, still waiting on that report being sorted.

12 Likes

Nothing to be worry indeed because now everyone will be mostly on the “same” page.

In custom battle Many R27er users were having fun to just spam missile on people spawning (thank to the short distance between air spawn), which mean you have even less time to react/defend properly against R27er vs any other SARH missiles from other country.
In joust, you are mostly the first one to break and go on defensive while a R27ER user could “safely” push (Except the multipath issue zone) on attack. While yes thank to Mirage handling (and the current FM of MiG-29/SU-27) once you succesfully defend a series of R27er missiles, it become easy to reverse from a defending position.
But still you have to go on defense, and give your six, with no trading off.

Now with Fox 3 we are “mostly” on the same page, you can push safely (if they don’t change the mutlipath) or even go defensive while the missile do its job, which will force the opponent to do the same (go on defensive too).

But let’s face it, custom battle will become even more hell, since now everyone will be able do the same.
And i’m more curious about the impact of ARH in Air Sim.

I hope this update won’t be just “only fox 3” update, hope fix are still comming:

  1. A fix for the issue of PD radar locking chaff even when the opponent fully go Head-on
  2. Separation of Flare & Chaff keybind won’t be delay
  3. Maybe a change for the multipath (guess it will depend of general balance)
  4. And as usual some tweak/fix for some aircrafts FM.
1 Like

All the issues you mentioned are exasperated now.

Is it me or the support for the Mica on the 5F are here?
received_985921013156626

That it

Is this new? Didn’t see them before

Here since a lot

Yeah someone pointed it out to me that it may get the missile nerfed a bit before I made the report but I went ahead with the report anyway.