Mirage 2000 Thread : Variants, performance, characteristics and sources

New suggestion that would add value to the Mirage 2000D RMV

BAT-120LG / ASPTT - Suggestions / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum

3 Likes

i finally spaded my 2000SC4 and WOW that jet is incredible with all unlocks, ace games become common, the only bad thing is the radar is stupid sometimes lol

and expert crew is also great, i love this jet!!

high BR? they are not high at all

Considering that Mirage 2000C is 12.3/12.7…

It’s not like it would be fair to put M2K at 12.0 with the Mirage F1 but just being strictly better besides not having 530Fs which… are joke missiles. The one that is 12.7 is there because it has HMD which is an advantage even over the CS5

1 Like

Soft factor.

I disagree with that. It might have an HMD and pretty good flight performances, but it’s not as agile as the C-S5, because it’s heavier. Also, it only has access to 2 magic 2s, which while good, is still very lacking, and can only access a gun via a gunpod with a very awkward placement.
All in all, I think that it’s GRB br is justified - and it could go higher but ground compression is still a thing - but in air loadout it could go to 12.3, while the D-R1 could go to 12.0.

no point for it to share br with f1c when it is just strictly better essentially

F1C still has access to more missiles (although they aren’t great), and a usable air radar. I think that balances the better FM of the M2K D

This doesn’t matter. 530Fs aren’t going to do anything 9 times out of 10 if not worse odds. The F1C also has half the flight model and worse RWR/bombing ability.

While the discussion is still about the Mirage F1, I’m taking the opportunity to post this bug report. This is a second one for the same problem, but since the devs missed the first one, here is the second iteration.

[DEV] Mirage F1 (all) missing second Phimat pod // Gaijin.net // Issues

5 Likes

I just realized that the Mirage 2000D RMV never received its Gbu-16s in-game. The bug report was marked as “fixed” but the aircraft never received them. This further increases the number of weapons missing from the aircraft.

[DEV] Mirage 2000D RMV missing GBU-16 // Gaijin.net // Issues

4 Likes

@WaretaGarasu Sorry to bother you, a few months ago when the Mirage 2000D RMV was added you had forwared the various bug reports concerning the missing weapons on the aircraft. The bug report below concerning the addition of the Gbu-16 on the aircraft is marked as fixed however the bomb has not been added, do you know if it is a bug or an oversight ?

[DEV] Mirage 2000D RMV missing GBU-16 // Gaijin.net // Issues

5 Likes


trust me guys, definitely the payload we should have

3 Likes

Bruh

New bug report that includes various elements from the previous report. This bug report is really important because it would finally bring a real bombing capability to the Mirage 2000, increasing the number of 250kg bombs to 16 or even 18 for some models.

Although the old bug report was forwarded several years ago, no corrections have been made and it would be good if that changed.

Mirage 2000 missing CLB8 bomb rack // Gaijin.net // Issues

8 Likes

And here is the same bug report for the Mirage F1s, which could install the CLB8 under its wings to carry 4 additional 250kg bombs

Mirage F1 missing CLB8 bomb rack // Gaijin.net // Issues

8 Likes

I have read the Mirage 2K-D could not use radar MICAs.

I believe his post was ironic (he is one of my friend so I’m pretty sure that it was)

Otherwise, yes the Mirage 2000D RMV can’t carry Mica EM

1 Like

Can still get MICA IR though. Having a couple R27ETs don’t hurt even at 13.7 if IRCCM works.

1 Like