Mikoyan MiG-29G: Poland's Euro-Fighter


The Mikoyan MiG-29G is a German modernization of the MiG-29 9.12A with NATO-standard avionics. With the EF-2000 Typhoon soon to enter service, the MiG-29G was retired from Luftwaffe service in 2002. The aircraft, numbering 18 MiG-29Gs and four MiG-29GT trainers (the entirety of Germany’s MiG-29 fleet save one MiG-29G kept for display), were sold to Poland for a symbolic €1 each. Quite the deal, buying 22 real MiG-29s for just over a quarter the cost of one digital MiG-29 Sniper! These aircraft would be delivered in 2004 and assigned to the 41st Tactical Air Squadron, accounting for approximately half of the Polish Air Force’s MiG-29 fleet. The MiG-29G/GT would be retired in 2022 with eleven donated to Ukraine between 2022 and 2023 and the other surviving aircraft on display at various museums and airbases.

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters


History


Specifications


The MiG-29G in-game


Gallery


Sources

5 Likes

+1 for Polish tech tree, you planning on doing the 9.12A next? I’ve got some cool stuff on it

+1

can i have one with the same price? (HAF actually sold F-86 for like 5.000 euros to anyone)

+1
it’s hilarious the fact it is true, i’d like one for myself in the garage i do not have

Holy it’s been like 45 minutes that’s gotta be a record
Usually suggestions take weeks to get approved, I’ve never heard of same-day let alone same-hour!

1 Like

This is gonna be a premium watch

Germany could potentially get a new premium top tier eventually ngl…
It wouldn’t actually be that bad as a premium assuming decompression is done

why buy a mig29 with 1 euro when you can buy an aircraft carrier for 1 dollar (it wont fit in your garage tho)

1 Like

Preferably yes in my opinion, allowing for the domestic MiG-29AM as the TT counterpart (Polish TT btw not Germany)
Assuming Gaijin keeps on their deicision that trees should have a MiG with R-73s and a MiG without, the MiG-29A could be 12.7 TT and the MiG-29A(M) 13.0 TT, and the MiG-29G as a 13.0 premium. Poland unfortunately is a bit strapped for premiums at Rank VIII.

1 Like

IF we get a Polish tree, which I do doubt will happen.

Since they did come from Germany though this may be a similar case as the Leopard 2PL

Btw is it actually MiG-29AM? I’ve seen sources refer to it either as MiG-29A or MiG-29M

1 Like

It will happen ☝️

1 Like

I wish you good luck in your endeavours

Either way it means more MiG-29, which I love

officially MIG29A(M), rest is unofficial names by users

1 Like

the wait never stops 💪

I love the MiG-29 too 🫶 Such an icon

1 Like

MiG-29 is love
MiG-29 is life

1 Like

Yeah you’re probably right. I think most officially it’d be A(M)? I just used AM to differentiate from the base A and from the actual MiG-29Ms (which are much larger upgrades!) and because it’s slightly shorter than A(M) lol
I haven’t done much research on it but my understanding is:
Phase I upgrades saw the original and ex-Czech MiG-29s received avionics upgrades essentially identical to the MiG-29G. There were then plans for phase II upgrades with increased range for the N019E radar plus new Thales RWR, and phase III would have seen the introduction of AIM-9s and AMRAAMs. But only phase I was done and there was a single phase II prototype. Also pitched but not considered was a Mikoyan proposal to upgrade the MiG-29s to MiG-29SE (MiG-29N) standard.
MiG-29A(M)s also apparently might have been upgraded to carry AMRAAMs prior to delivery to Ukraine, and they definitely got JDAMs and HARMS. But the latter two at least happened after being donated.

Anyways not next. Most likely I’ll be making a suggestion for another aircraft, now that I’ve found a pretty decisive answer to the question of AIM-9L or AIM-9L(I)-1 ;)

1 Like

+1 for Poland tree

You can have the one from GER tech tree. I don’t think players need it.

I see that you got access to that one powerpoint from WZL2 as well

Didn’t know that there was a phase II prototype, thanks for letting me know

About the Phase III though, I remember a friend of mine talking about it, the missiles were tested but wouldn’t function properly from what I remember? There was an issue with getting some sort of “access codes” from Russia apparentally

correct 1 was build!

as far as i can say it was more of a compatibility problem missile-radar, but considering the scarsity of sources, it could be we are talking of the same thing but with different words

1 Like