Such a comparison, MiG 29 and F-15
F-35 has S-ducts for the air intake and has a superior stealth profile in general, the Su-57 has exposed engine intakes and an inferior stealth profile to even an F-35 with external weapons
Su-57 has a similar RCS to the super hornet, F-35 will see him miles before the Su-57 can see anything back, it is a hugely inferior aircraft for BVR
worse radar, worse sensors, worse integration, worse stealth
Does it matter?
clearly it matters when 1 is the practical aircraft produced in the thousands and another is a magic wunderwaffe with inferior capabilities all round
I don’t know who’s better, and I know it doesn’t matter. The F-35 is full of its own problems and the Su 57 is too, purely in terms of looks the Su 57 is much nicer. The F-35 has too short wings and the wide fuselage doesn’t have much beauty.
the “problems” of the F-35 only exist in the headlines of sensationalist articles and in the mouths of propagandists, in reality it is the best fighter in the world
If you’re thinking.
The Su-57 has radar blockers
Proof
This is the 13th in a row.Not counting failures of equipment with a successful outcome
yet F-35 has one of the lowest crash rates per flight hour of any military aircraft
and a massively inferior RCS in general
Where are the statistics?
Where is the evidence?
This is nonsense, not evidence.I’ve been watching this site
it’s RCS simulations based off the geometries of the aircraft, which is not difficult to calculate
just because it makes your ass sore does not make it nonsense