I also had not clue that anything relating to momentum was modelled as we cannot use the Aircraft momentum alone in high angles of attack to toss the aircraft with the engine idle. It almost just dies right there floating in a stall. Very interesting. Thank you for bringing that to my attention.
As for the moment of inertia I have no idea what the current values of 35000.0 signify. You would know. I have no idea how that would look if it went up or down in value.
Again, I had no idea the had moment of inertia modelled so I am playing catch up my apologies. Whether those values are static no matter whether an aircraft weighs less or more depending on fuel state and weapon loads is something I would be interested to know.
how come it was never brought to our attention the range was set and locked 30 and -20 AoA?
Oh yeah, we should all agree this is not accurate and the full range of alpha the aircraft is capable. It is clearly off.
The alpha looks accurate there, ~29 degrees peak and -22 for the low. This isn’t the “maximum alpha” rather the sustainable AoA before wing rock onset and other instabilities for the most part.
In real life the flight control system has that 26 degree limiter (which you can exceed), but it should exhibit instabilities beyond that point and it does.
The F-16 had a similar limit irl (25°) but due to the relaxed static stability it is much more dangerous to exceed those limits for fear of departure. When I am back at my PC I can pull up the F-16’s for comparison (if you’d like).
If you believe it is missing lift, the lift coefficients are there also.
Read the manual. We’ve shared it for you multiple times and you’ve not once yet referenced it. You already know all my comparisons and reports required the use of the manual as a primary reference.
Wait you cannot post exactly where it is? but you like to sniff out like a little rat the exact sentence and graph showing lift coefficient?
While your at it, answer the question.
What part of the statement do you agree with and which part don’t you agree with?
So, you believe the Mig29 model is perfect (don’t make me bring up the quote) you based that off Gio’s testing. He also states the F-16C is not over performing by any means.
So, the Fulcrum series is just simply an inferior aircraft of the Russian Federation?
It’s so inferior it needs R27ERs? Is that it?
That is essentially what you have been saying the entire time without directly doing so lest you be disregarded completely.
