I think the word you mean is disingenuous. Indigenous is just academic speak for natives.
MiG-29 initial turn values in RU manual appear to be taken at 24 AoA. F-16 AoA limit is 25 AoA. ITR values in both manuals reflect those AoA limits.
Technically both planes should have increased ITR by going beyond those limits but the F-16 would benefit more from it due to its CL Max likely being further beyond it’s AoA limit than the MiG-29.
that is true but the F-16 will not let you exceed that by much as the FCS tries to put you back below 25° and might even completly lock your controls if you manage to get close to 30° AOA
with the Mig-29s “dumber” FCS you should able to maintain alot more controll even when reaching critical AOA
22°/s is the empty fuel load
I ofc dont know this and this pure speculation but im pretty shure the FCS limitations are still similiar - especially the AOA limit.
With less fuel the AOA limit would barely change - its meant to counter the inherent instability of the F16, wich with decreasing fuel load increases due to the positioning of the fuel tanks.
So its just an assumption to think that the AOA (and therefor the turn-limits) are somewhat similiar.
I made the assumption that the AOA-Limit wouldnt change relative to the fuel-state of the aircraft (or if so only barely) but if im wrong I apoligize for spreading misinfo
AoA limit dosent change but the STR changes
I mean ITR would decrease as fuel load increases because the plane pulls more gs for the same turn when it’s heavier no? So at high speed when pulling, the plane hits the g limit before the aoa limit, the greater fuel load would make it appear worse
So why are we comparing an empty plane to one that is carrying 3 tons of fuel?
because I originally thought AOA (and therefore turnrate) restrictions wouldnt change dynamically with the extra weight difference of empty vs full fuel
Ive noticed this is wrong and apologize for suggesting this was an equal comparison
Can’t wait to see F-16’s do these at the next airshow
Pilot reports Gsh-23 can fire Nato 20mm
gaijin when MiG-29M2
Just any new 29 ;)
Gaijin when MiG-29M 9.15, 9.61 and MiG-35S
Sure hope to see that in the near future. I’m not really on point with its technical data tbh but 2 extra R-77’s + better engines already sounds good for me.
How much did you get from the 6 kills mission?
Eh I couldn’t say really, I died that match and I just jumped to the next ones
shame its gonna be the normal R-77s tho since its a 90s jet
True, tho having 2 more to just sling with an HMD lock is not that bad.
I say HMD just because even if the Zhuk M of the smt is good, the r77 long range performance is non existent, so most of the launches end up being well within the range of the HMD.
From what I understand the 29M is gonna get the base Zhuk radar, so I think it might rely on HMD locks even more.
Yeah it has the zhuk from the yak 141
The MiG-29M2 from 2005 and the MiG-29KR uses the improved zhuk found on the SMT
