Ur right! It indeed can
Here’s a full list of what it can carry.
1 Like
That plane would probably sit at 13.3 or something like that
My hope is that 2x142 kN engines + Bars radar + Canards + TVC will make it top BR in the upcoming patches and therefore can’t be made into a premium 🙏
1 Like
Doesn’t AL-41 was usual non TVC when tested on Su-27M2?
No radar but limited WVR Air-to-Air Missile only ?
Or add MiG-23MLD (23-19) to early rank VIII before MiG-29, but could be 12.3
Depends on version but yes. In version UB it can carry 6x R-73 and in version UBM it have expanded armament on the R-27T/ET. Both version still have IRST.
iz. 23-19 is another option. But practically it would not be much different from the current iz. 23-18 except for the R-73. 23P would be more different and there would be no risk that it would grow in BR at the moment the radar was fixed as its practically MLA without air-ground weaponry (except Kh-23M).
MiG-23-98 with R-27 and R-73
And R-77, but it might catapult it too high (still, would be fun to annoy 4th gens with upbeat 3rd)
1 Like
I don’t know, Su-37 used the Al-37FU
Internal or pod cannon ?
Without R-27R & R-27T ?
None R-27R & R-27ER only ?
I suppose might be MiG-29 (9-12) and on group with MiG-29 (9-13). light airframe like MiG-29 9-12A & 9-12B but early service limit WVR R-60M Air-to-Air Missile
Retain Klimov RD-33 and N019 Rubin radar (MiG-29 9-13)
With the addition of the PKVP-23s, as the total number of chaff/flares was brought up to 72
Sapfir-23P / RP-23P radar and R-23R/R-23T
But re retrofitted Sapfir RP-23MLA radar and R-24R/T air-to-air missiles, no IRST and a HUD display (MiG-23Bis)
The PVO operate MiG-23P & MiG-23Bis did in fact arm them with Kh-23 air-to-ground missiles only
MiG-23P might researchable tree on MiG-23 group or the first premium golden eagle ?
The first variant with R-77 for soviet/russia tech tree
But pre R-73M IR Air-to-Air Missile service ? 🤔
Internal cannon.
Only R-27T/ET. No SARH variant as it doesnt have radar.
Countermeasures are questionable. It doesnt have them irl but thats not a big deal as Gaijin add flares based on posibility to mount them.
For the MiG-29UBM only ?
Both MiG-29UB & MiG-29UBM ?
Both have internal cannon and only UBM have R-27T/ET.
But MiG-29UB limited R-60M & R-73 WVR Air-to-Air missile ?
Yes.
Bug report:
Russian guided bombs incorrect max release speed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/GXDSC2gueyO0
Given that the minimum release speed is also given, I assume the 1100 kph figure is IAS/EAS.
This would translate to decreased Mach number on the deck but increased Mach number at higher altitudes.
removing the ER’s and giving the r73’s has been leading idea for most people to fix the feel of the 29A’s since pretty much the get go. Personally, i also prefer the separation of the regular 9.12’s with r60’s at a step lower. Then u would have the 29G for germany with archers and 9.13 for russia, potentially also adding a 9.12 into the RU TT as well would be nice for completeness. Unfortunately, gaijin has so far been holding on to their idea of 29 balance with the 2x ER’s and 4x utterly useless r60’s at 12.7 - but hopefully we can see this changed sooner rather than later.
5 Likes