The flanker is a monster, funnily enough IRL the plane that’s most to blame for the mig29 K/D is the su27 lol. It’s just that i’m more of a fulcrum man when talking about russian stuff, i know that compared to other 4th gen the 29 is probably the less capable jet because of bvr stuff, but i just love its simplicity.
1 Like
playing the SMT rn and it feels so good to have a modern radar & rwr. Night & day difference from the Su27
We need the Product 9-18 (SMT upgrade without fuel tank 1) if GJ feels the SMT cannot be improved.
Without the fuel tank does mean its lighter because less fuel pumps, etc. less surface panels too since it is not enlarged in the spine.
@ZVO_12_INCH do you know if the SMT has 2x ER/ET x2 R/T capability in one loadout like the K? Not sure if the K has 4x ER capability. Never seen it.
I think we should get the Yemeni one instead as a premium jet. 2 non premium SMT doesn’t make any sense.
1 Like
Well only because its FM is crap at moment.
But it does sound like a great premium. Then again, active missiles as a premium?
It cannot be top tier, remember.
1 Like
Eagle :
Still not supermaneuverable :)
The Eagle cannot perform controlled side slipping.
That angle of attack seems a little fake too. But because it’s you, I will believe it.
I remain 100% correct. No fighter is quite like the Flanker. Not even the F-22.
I guess MiG-29SMT 9-18 from Yemen it might premium pre-order pack in rank 9
But wait aircraft premium pack at rank 9 in 3 or 4 years
If its a model with 4 pylons then yes it would, they all share that same capacity
1 Like
I only ever saw the variants with 8 pylons carry 4x R-27, so that would be MiG-29M and K variants. They have structural improvements too
It’s just that every plane has its advantages, there is no one best. Never and nowhere.
Spin tests of the F-15, there they achieved the stated AoA, by the way, above 24 AoA the Su 27 can be somewhat problematic, so it is more accurate to talk about 24 AoA for the Su 27,but it depends on each one’s choice.
Actually this is accomplishments. The 120+ can be from the F-15 STOL/MTD
The F-15 is not capable of 120+ degree alpha.
It needs thrust vectoring & canards.
No one said the Flanker is the best. I said it’s the most aerodynamically perfected.
It can go Mach 2+, supermaneuverable without thrust vectoring. No fighter is capable of what the Flanker can do unless it has thrust vectoring.
No, don’t look for something that’s not there, the report’s from 1976.
Well then you need to put in a bug report because the F-15 is not pulling any where near 120+ degrees angles of attack at any speed in full real. I have all F-15s :)
If its not referring to all accomplishments of every variant, where do you place the F-15 STOL/MTD’s AoA?
At 180+ degrees with its canards & thrust vectoring?
Typhoon?
Remember, the F-15 doesn’t have a movable leading edge wing or slots.
And yet it can tail slide, stable AoA near 40, Mach 2.5, isn’t that fantastic?
It’s not controlled. The F-15 is not capable of doing a Pugachev’s Cobra, J-turn, Kvochur’s Bell.
It will enter a deep stall. The Su27 will not.
The Mig-29 can only cobra & hit 90 degrees. It’s not capable of controlled side slipping.
Sorry no. Great jet. Not supermaneuverable.
Sorry, no :(
Amazing jet though.
This is not accurate, a normal pilot will not give any of these maneuvers. The average pilot stayed below 24 AoA, and the better ones got above. Look for nothing more than that.
The cobra may not, the other maneuvers are highly effective in dogfights. So effective the Americans had a change of heart & equipped their 5th generation air superiority fighters with thrust vectoring.
The F-15 doesn’t have deep stall, the Su 27 might have that, given its some similarity to the F-16.