I already gave him the answer, he can ask ANY tech mod. In fact, most (if not all) of them have disclosed to bug reporters the status of their reports. @Gunjob and others tend to say as much directly in the comments of the reports.
Whether I go ahead and share that information like I did with the RD-33 Series 3 on the MiG-29 or the fuse delay changes (among other things) on the magic 2 is then up to me. They hadn’t asked me to keep it private, or I would have.
What report was the Series 3 under?
Please read more carefully. The tech moderators report. It would be internal.
I ask if x has been reported. They confirm it has.
I ask the status on the report. They confirm it’s accepted and will be fixed (or not).
Then, I see a change in the datamine. I inquire if it’s the fix, it’s confirmed or denied. Simple.
Okay so it actually is my fault, i read Mig’s first message as the SMT getting a new loadout.
I only noticed afterwards that he was talking about the engine.
Those change did happened and the plane “technically” got a new engine.
Was a lil tired that day so i acted quite rude toward mig.
Mig and i are using the same tool that a friend made because he was bored.
We have access to the same data so mig’s datamine could be as accurate as mines.
Mig just doesn’t have the same knowledge that gzabi taught me.
There was no other change to the engine but the name has been changed on the dev server
Ok fair enough. Thank you.
I guess the only question that remains is how soon we can advertise unreleased content before it is ever announced officially.
It’s technically official as soon as it’s visible on dev server files since any user can download and inspect those files on a whim.
He claims those random websites are proof.
At the moment, it’s just nonsense as you said.
Frankly as soon as i announce it in my datamine.
That’s basically what the rumor thread is for.
When gzabi was datamining, he was posting that dita in the thread, but i don’t play all the time and it happen thay i just cannt post on forums, that’s why we upload on reddit and discord.
I would get a legal official answer on that one before you make that claim. Who told you? Your moderator?
That’s how it works.
you can’t even trust the changelogs sometime
As the last one did say that the engine nale changed, yet the change was only on the dev server.
Ill take that. Thank you,
Didn’t see everyone’s response.
You posted a magazine interiview with a nameless matra business man as proof. Lets be a little fair in their beef and let them be.
An article citing matra officials can be considered a secondary source. Usable in reports. What he shared is worthless… kindly follow your own advice.
There was no primary that was literally all you had was magazine interview with a nameless businessman.
Just let them share their sources. No need to pounce on either. @BBCRF has some interesting info as well.
Kindly listen to the senior forum mods as you said. Who suggested you stop interacting with me. Just as I asked since day one.
Same here.
İ refused to grind F-16C, started with Barak-II cause i wanted to boost my Israel Ground line-up then switched to SMT and boy it was a terrible experience compare to Barak-ıı.
After i spaded F-16C i realized the performance difference and it was disgusting tbh.
İm expecting Su-27 and F-15 tbh.
But Gripen is on my radar.
I’m too lazy to search for everything on the Internet right now.
SMT has more drag because of the enlarged fin.
Global Defense Corp isn’t a trust worthy source
The only significant aerodynamic changes, if you can call it that, is the retractable probe.
Which “fin” is enlarged?
Unrelated, but what is everyones take on the new engines? Also what fuel settings have you decided are best?
I am actually loving taking 20min internal and the drop tank. lots of fuel and you can drop it and be almost dogfight ready (still need to burn some off)
Still testing it in games but the SMT has definitely gotten a little faster I have outrun everyone pretty easy today on the deck. Before it was rare, I can get away in it now like other Mig29s.