probably gonna remove the dragchute container from the model now
maybe they are trying to make it equipable
maybe, but i wouldn’t be to upset with the removal of it outright, with the new airfield arrestor cable making it kinda redundant anyway
(i just belly slam on the runway whenever i land)
1 Like
well i think that gaijin dosent do things without reason
aka they announced reworked 29SMT MFDs bc they were going to add the 29K
3 Likes
1 Like
Having options is always great in my opinion. And giving you a way to equip or unequip it in a loadout menu would be cool.
Is is 1 or is it I? Because it is "I"ndian after all
1 Like
That’s an interesting remark because I’ve seen people mistakenly call the Jaguar IS “Jaguar 1S” and others similar cases
iam calling it TopSight-1 bc thats how it was called where i got that graphic
Is there any reason right now to unlock and play the MiG-29K with 32 countermeasures instead of the MiG-29M?
Carrier planes are cool asf.
Plus extra cms got passed as a suggestion.
1 Like
can u send link?
Would take MiG-29K from 32 Large cal Cm → 64 Large cal Cm
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/5qUhPtk2zzw0
3 Likes
That’s a shame, but good that it is more accurate.
surely it will go to 13.3 where Su-30MK is found with same loadout, right?
3 Likes
No, is mig 29. You will suffer.
7 Likes
It’s also a tech tree so they have no reason to not make it garbage
2 Likes
watch them deny lowering its br with “MiG-29SMT is at 13.3 and it has less missiles and worse performance”
1 Like
As long as we have a MiG-29 that behaves well, idc about the outermost pylons + it’s historical