Cool and loud highway takeoff at 4:25
2 Likes
We both know Batman kicks Superman ass 24/7, still like you said there is no need for piss content.
Both design are gorgeous and deserves proper love.
I always viewed them as having different jobs.
Su-27 as a Air Superiority fighter, and MiG-29 as a short range interceptor.
yes it is, you have no the slightest understanding how fighter jet combat, economic, and logistical efficiency are calculating
they are not, su27 is limited with 8g at fuel loading more then 30% when mig29 can pull 9g with 100% fuel
they are have same low speed charts only if you fill su27 not more than 30% fuel so you have same flight perfomance and range with worse characteristics (x10 rcs/ x1.6 ir emission) and this if for x2 price
no its not, al31f have more fuel consumption because it has larger diameter
what this mean
it will lose in all combat scenarios excluding ACM to a f15c without ground guidance
mig31 will vaporize them both even in ACM, it has r73 too
bug mig29 still has more chances because rcs and ir emmission still much lower
Logistics?
The SU-27 can fly like 2,000 km on internal fuel the 29 is out of fuel after a single intercept lol
Buddy the flanker smokes the fulcrum
Not only that, but the MiG-29 has been smoked by sea harrier FA.2 in Poland
rofl, go calculate Mz with this fuel load
with full fuel load mig29 has 5min of AB at 800kmh, when su27 has 10min of AB in the same speed and full fuel load
this is even without fuel tank
Half as much lmao
And it turns worse
go make calculations and write here, your words makes no sense
surprisingly how this shit just take off
you are not understand what this chart means
I do, you clearly don’t.
Have a great day I’m done speaking with you now.
thank you
buddy cannot go a single day without mentioning the harrier
7 Likes
No it’s peak
wrong
AL-31 has a specific fuel consomption of ~0.075 on mil thrust while stationary means for every Newton of thrust it produces it burns 0.075 kg of fuel per hour
the RD-33 burns 0.079 kg per Newton of thrust per hour
means it is less efficent
even at full afterburner the Al-31 is more efficent with a specific fuel consumption of ~0.19 against the RD-33 with 0.21
the Al-31 if anything burns more fuel becasue it has more thrust
but if you were to make the AL-31 be limited to the exact same thrust as the RD-33 then it would burn less fuel
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
the AL-31 will also produce ~1.5 times more thrust, while only burning 1.4 times the fuel
meaning it is more efficent
reading comprehension is at an all time low for you again, i see
and you convieniently ignore the afterburning fuel consumption for both of them
Spoiler
iam waiting for the day you are getting forum banned
2 Likes
Found someone who loves the mig29 more than me
well seams to depend on what do you mean by efficient
and to make maters worse there is after burning and non after burning efficiency
Spoiler
we love you too!
7 Likes