Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

forward hemisphere RWR doesn’t even work when radar is on

1 Like

yes
with rd33 engine and completed e-8 aerodynamic scheme it will have empty mass maybe near 6000 and with 2000kg fuel it will have TWR 1.0375 and 1.1 with late rd33k

with composites empty mass probably 5300-5600 and with rcs reduced 10 times

rwr irl is not working same as even in dcs
this is very unstable thing

truthnuke

Damn, that’s nice, actual hopium for once.
I just hope that final version won’t have such AA clusterfuck with OSAs firing on the move with pinpoint accuracy and RWR sceaming 24/7.

1 Like

its time to just let go at this point. Enjoy it while you can in this event

Yup, the dev agreed that as of now AI targets are a bit broken and need some polishment so we might see some improvements soon, it would be nice to be able to use a10/su25 without having to saturate AAs with dozens of agms.

Also he said that helis might be added to the mode

1 Like

I hadn’t even noticed lmao

Gaijin drops a video talking about the “supposed” MiG-29 improvement, and it turns out 95% of the comments are just “fix the FM"

7 Likes

Yes over buff the already overperforming FM lol

do you also go in other threads of overperfoming FMs or do you conviniently only post here?

5 Likes

The pretty on point FM you mean

(You don’t even understand basic physics so you assessments is invalid)

1 Like

Funny complaint considering almost every FM is overperforming.
Go back to your harrier post

9 Likes

Harrier fans trying to not steal other threads challenge (impossible)

2 Likes

I’ve done the F-15A as well

He does this with whatever plane killed him last in Air Sim. Next week he will probably be complaining about the MiG-21 or F-4E.

15 Likes

Hardly lol

I’ve not died to a fulcrum in recent memory

I should have corrected my statement to say “whatever plane he jumped out of in front of after it fired a missile.”

4 Likes

not f-15c and mig29

btw they both is bad in game, but insane good irl for their part and time

2 Likes

Context is required, because if you’re saying that the F-15C is bad, then I’ll give you a Glueless emoji.

2 Likes

He means F-15C flight model, APPARENTLY it is underperforming by a good margin. However, from what I’ve seen all the documents required to prove this are all classified.

3 Likes