Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)


Yeah. It is.

(This is the 9.13)

1 Like

Also some older reports pls support
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZwBeON5lVoE6
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZMg62RP02ThW

1 Like

Good lord Dodec is full of doomers.

I try and bring some good news about some possible MiG-29 changes and I just get hate. :(



1 Like

@Balta779517-live new pfp? I fw it.
image

yes :)

1 Like

“wheres my F18 flight performance”…nuke the whole server

2 Likes

image
Someone just isn’t tactical enough i’d say

4 Likes

image
Man this angle absolutely ruins MiG-29M stat card
Compare this to KR
image
Also 29M should have USSR flag behind it, program was from USSR, and technically died with the fall of it. Unless Gaijin wants to turn it inot MiG-29OVT which was converted when it was Russia already

1 Like

Yeah the KR still uses the old angle, it will probably change to the new one someday.

If you look at flankers statcards, all the russian ones got the new anglem but then if you look at the J-11’s they still got the old one.

So does Yak-141 and a lot of other stuff, i doubt that angle will change

Usually they change them during dev servers and such, and Gszabi’s datamine shows both the new one and old.

I’m surprised the Yak-141 didn’t get a new one considering it got a detailed 3D model recently.

One that I noticed that got changed for example is the Su-7.

if only the basic Mig-29 hud was correct to begin with

currently it is an unholy combination from the Mig-29 and the Su-27 HUD

2 Likes

improved_tactics

6 Likes

i guess its tall box ACM should be +56 to -10 elveation and 3,5 in width instead of what it has rn?
image
image

2 Likes

we literally have German MiG-29 manual and can’t get HUD right?

Does that say the ACM range should also be 15km instead of 10km?

i made 10 reports on the Mig-29 HUD

and they all sat there for around a year now

1 Like

yes

1 Like

looks like it yeah

1 Like

Thanks

Thanks