While proving something like that is pretty much impossible, without acess to private stuff, it wouldn’t surprise me one bit
@Dzhkグ i don’t think that Fantom is big on “historical accuracy”. More like he’s big on using “historical accuracy” as a tool to push his own desires into the game.
6 Likes
Sukhoi payroll is real
1 Like
Shame. I expected better of him.
That’s everyone when bug reporting tho. Like why bug report something you don’t care about?
Like I care about mig-29 and su-27. That’s why basically all my bug reports are on those planes and I don’t bug report other stuff often
Idk i would love there to be a degree of scrutiny against bug reports about removing features, it should be harder to remove stuff from the plane requiring extraordinary proof that it indeed cant do it, rather than them being willy nilly about how much needed to add or remove, like you could always remove stuff its a damn toggle at that point, but adding new stuff should be much easier as ‘proof’ would require ‘sekret’ documents.
Oh no, there is a different intent behind bug reports. And his recent reports show that there is a malicious intent behind them. You can care about something and want it to be done right so you make a bug report, or you can care about something being specifically how you want it and make specifically chosen bug reports. How can you explain why MiG-29 CMs being ahistorical only surfaced what, 4 whole years after it was added to the game? Moreover, at least one huge rework of countermeasures as a system was done in the game after that, giving you ability to make custom ratio of chaff and flares, and there was zero activity around it. Hell, even when MiG-29 was literally the best top tier jet in the game and bullied F-16s no one looked at its countermeasures
this is not true the brm who approved the rafale stuff is not even part of the WT team anymore (not to speak that the rafale reports were made by someone completely different)+ i am 100% fantom is not german, and the other one if you are referring to bowie knife is also not german (not so sure about this one tho)
Imo if a plane didn’t have something it shouldn’t have it but obv gaijin doesn’t care, they just pick Willy nilly when to have realism and when not to have realism for balance.
So sometimes you just have to accept that the fact is gaijin is consistent at being inconsistent on what aspects of realism is modeled. All you can really do is bug report stuff and see if they choose to listen or not
Obviously you can’t read someone’s mind, but if I was him, it would prolly go something gimme this.
Obviously he had all the docs before hand, but this whole debacle probably->
-Make him decide to scour through his docs for stuff specifically related to countermeasures
-he found something that he previously just glossed over because he didn’t look into it
I’ve done the exact same many times, it’s why so many people can read the exact same manual a million times yet come away with something different.
You or other people can read the same thing and have different interpretations. It’s kinda like art, where different people can see different things when consuming art
1 Like
Yeah thats why i am put the hat on, personally i didnt play then, so its not my place to comment i just found this comment funnny
Yeah bro power tripped and needs to take his calming pills, i would say over half of his reports kinda makes sense before the Mig29 came
And he somehow still glossed over MiG-29 9-12 incapable of using R-27ERs and Ts? I understand that you are biased towards him, but this doesn’t feel like he just glossed over it
No he knows that. But it’s simple lol, gaijin doesn’t care. He’s literally stated it about stuff like kh38 on su-25 for example.
He can show gaijin a loadout chart, that doesn’t have those missiles. But because gaijin chooses to have those missiles in game, he can’t do anything.
He’s stated this many times before
that has been reported enough that i dont think he would bother
but gaijin suddenly cares about 9-12 countermeasures?
Again, look at what I said above. I would bet he didn’t just reported it because b4 he simply glossed over it.
It’s what I’ve done for example with r-27 gimbal
Limit.
Thousand of people have read the exact same manual yet no one bothered to report it
Again, glossed over for 4 whole years.
That easily happens lol. Look at r-27 gimbal limit for example. That thing has been wrong for 4 years as well but no one reported it until me 4 years later.
The same docs has been sitting around for 4 years but no one reported it
4 years of MiG-29 already, time flies
6 Likes