The great battle for the fate on MiG-29K begins
its already lost
“neve”
In the NUKE mode, I took off from the aircraft carrier with a full load of fuel to attack the enemy’s aircraft carrier. During the return journey, I couldn’t activate the engine boost as it would result in insufficient fuel to return to my own aircraft carrier or airport. If this happened, the aircraft would crash on the sea due to the lack of fuel, which would probably be a huge joke among all the carrier-based fighter planes in this game.
Did they just choose “NOT A BUG” without even taking a look? That’s too quick.
1 Like
of course they did
1 Like
Bot a nug
Just like Su-30SM neve carried double pylons?
4 Likes
or Su-27SM
3 Likes
Or Su-30SM2, or Su-30MKM. Or MiG-29 9-12 never carried R-27ER (couldn’t even comprehend it, actually). Or F-5C and F-5A never carried flares, or… the list goes on
5 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BJ7nF2pGqiDa
here is the OG bug report that got them removed
Bruh… dude is thanos of nerfs xd
I’m curious about the reason why they made the MiG-29K look so ugly and included it in the game. No one would play it because it’s neither realistic nor has any value in PVP. It merely takes up space on our computer hard drives and does nothing but harm those who love the MiG-29.
and they removed the images and brochure in the comments of that report that showed the r27 with the 29k
At the same time, there are also issues with the X-ray of the MiG-29K. In reality, the person sitting in the rear is the pilot, or a modularized fuel tank (shown as yellow in the X-ray). But now the X-ray there is an electronic module (shown as purple in the X-ray).
he responded to all of the comments including the ones with the export brochure and stuff
1 Like
Well, if Gaijin moves 27SM to 14.0, MiG-29K might get a role in the game… albeit a role that it can’t sustain with only 6 Fox-3s and 32 countermeasures
Give me 6 R-77-1 and 64 CMs then we can talk about a capable plane
4 Likes
One more complaint and i will remove Zhuk as well and put N019 inside
4 Likes
12.7BR to 13.7BR MiG-29s are already too many. We simply don’t have enough space for more. For instance, the MiG-29SM is right in between 9.13 and SMT. It can’t be placed either upwards or downwards. I think they should not keep the current MiG-29K as it is. Instead, they should change it to 9.31, and then add 9.41 in 14.0，and give it R–77-1.
9.31 is just worse 9.15, and we already have this thin in the game, there is pretty much 0 chances of gaijin introducing a copy paste aircraft that will also require a completely different 3D model. And I am convinced that MiG-35 is what gaijin will put at 14.0, giving it R-77-1s. They will not even have to change much in terms of 3D model. And because it’s a MiG, we won’t get HMD, targeting pod or even proper IRST functionality. MiG-35 will just gonna be MiG-29K but with 77-1s and lighter airframe
1 Like