It’s not necessarily either or. Can be underperforming and how the devs want it.
Also true
The MiG-35 will also be placed in a higher BR along with the Su-35S and even the Su-35SM, in order to highlight Sukhoi’s superiority.
In both reality and the game, whether it’s the thrust of the engine or the number of weapons, heavy fighter jets are superior to medium and light fighter jets in every aspect. However, in the game, medium and light fighter jets, using less ammunition and worse high-altitude performance, are placed in the same BR or even higher. This makes them almost ineligible to participate in battles, because they are like food being brutally slaughtered. This is not just a problem for the MIG-29, but also for excellent fighter jets like the F-16, which are also completely unwilling to play them due to this unfair BR distribution. The MIG-29 is the most severe case, because no matter which BR, there are better Su-27/Su-30s to suppress her.
1 Like
Ngl it looks so much better than the others, I thought it was a real pic for a second
1 Like
jas39 have 1% loss in game. ef2000 have 4%
this aircraft was created much later than they were, using new technologies, and there is no reason to increase losses
F-16s at least have flight models and usually avionics as well
1 Like
However, she was unable to achieve the high altitude and high speed required for a heavy fighter jet to provide sufficient energy for the missile during launch, enabling it to maneuver and fly further.
Gaijin seems to be using intake loss as a way to force aircraft to perform according to charts, not as a realistic number. Comparing it to other aircrafts seems to be useless
source that current jet charts is realistic
Ask gaijin for that, not me.
issue isnt acceleration but speed bleed
1 Like
so what is a Su-35SM
I’m not sure if my information is correct. It is said that this is a Su-35S equipped with the same phased array radar as the Su-57. So far, only two have been delivered for use (unfortunately, I don’t have first-hand information. The information from China is rather limited. If I’m wrong, please correct me).
there is no Su-35SM
OK. Thank you for your correction.
It actually accelerates slower than the SU-27/30 AND loses speed extremely quickly during maneuvers, but the fact is, the biggest problem here is the loss of speed even during a simple 90-degree turn to get into a notching position—I was actually shocked by the difference between the SU-30MKK/SU-27SM and the MiG-29SMT—there’s no comparison. The MiG-29 has only slightly better energy retention than the Draken, another champion of losing speed during simple maneuvers -_-…
The MiG-29 needs a buff in this area right away; it handles like a rocket-powered barrel rather than a fighter jet.
that dosent make it an issue becasue there are acceleration charts for the Mig and it matches them if not being slightly better than them
the AESA radar is still in testing/development, it isn’t the same as N036 (the one on the Felon) but it should share some technologies with it.
That being said, Su-35SM isn’t a real designation used by the RU MOD.
… It was a long time ago, with the first ~4 or so Su-35S to use R-37M, but that designation has since been removed.
Source:
(George works at UAC)
3 Likes
@GitGood @Balta779517-live
did you guys find a radar MFD page for the any of the modern fulcrums?
because its the only WT relevant one that i couldnt find
all images of MFD pages i currently have:
2 Likes