Shush, Kuznetsov slander shall not be tolerated. Big man is finally resting for good.
Will be MiG-29M able carry 4x R-27ET?
airwar shows this table for the weapon loadouts. Dunno how accurate it is
2 Likes
Aaaand second question…RD-33K have what fuel consumption compared to standard RD-33?
According to Gordon - 7% less specific fuel consumption on afterburner
airwar also gives this table without saying what is the source of it
1 Like
Pretty good. Thanks.
Can’t slander a ship that isn’t even in service anymore
1 Like
Hey, at least it never shat itself.
1 Like
Poor thing is getting so old, might happen like old people
Still crazy how Russia now has carrier air wings but no carrier
does it have 7% less in game or is it still the same as on the older migs?
in the game probably not, the su30sm2 has only two
in files mig now have same
1 Like
It feels less, but i dunno exactly. Statshark doesn’t show it as well, so probably only dataminers could look it up for sure
Pitty. Well nevermind. 6x R-73 + 2x R-27ET is still good.
1 Like
u could do a simple timed test between the 9.15 and other mig’s - localhost shows remaining fuel in kg, or u could get it from wtrti too (which is also based on local host numbers but overlayed in game). Just would need to make sure u start the test on same alt/speed so its reasonably similar engine states - might not be scientific with the different acceleration rates causing rpm differences but I would imagine should be close enough to see if its even modeled differently.
I could do it myself…but cant be stuffed rn lmao
1 Like
9-15
Spoiler
9-12
Spoiler
800 kph test give same result
so probably no
well there u go
one more into the pile of unfinished stuff
1 Like
yeah, only 2 ER or ET, but up to 4 R or T (kinda useless but might work during module grind)
1 Like
well we can always bug report if it goes unchanged i have another source that lists 7% less consumption
2 Likes
2x 27ET + 2x 27T
or 4x 27T
1 Like