Now for sure
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CKkTcbPdgQBN
If they reject it now, I give up
2 Likes
You can’t really make a bug report on a topic like that
But it is technically wrong, how do you suppose it should be corrected? Because ignoring the issue doesn’t seem right to me
Because how do you measure exact lift coefficient without going into datamined sources
alot less channel loss on this when compared to earlier variants
1 Like
The report is not about what the lift coefficient value should be, but about how the lift coefficient should not be the same, given that the MiG-29M and MiG-29A have different horizontal stabilizers, with the MiG-29M having a larger one. It doesn’t make aerodynamic sense for the coefficient to be identical. It seems like people don’t want read it all
5 Likes
Thank god mig locked in and removed the gills of the mig-29
1 Like
Here’s hoping.
Though at this point, I’m scared of hope and probable disappointment.
Man I love the 3D models, peak
2 Likes
This thing has insane acceleration, probably unrealistic
1 Like
how it honestly felt like taking this out in test drive
4 Likes
1 Like
Uptiers of doom and despair
1 Like
Rocketship 29? Ay count me in man
2 Likes
Biblically accurate mig 29
1 Like
nope it is 24° as well for the fullcrum
no other report attach the sources in the historical section which can be only seen by the tech mods and the person who made the report
they then also list their sources
example:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/EljNegnDJ53F
