Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29/35 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

i have something very special just to spite ppl like you

3 Likes

They should give you the Su-57, like preview version.

So you can complete the hangar.

1 Like

image

i cant even fit all the digital camos i have there
image


1 Like

can they atleast accept one report
image
image

4 Likes

That is not an FGA-29. FGA-29 is the antenna with 652 elements. As you can read in my post here KRET states that the antenna with over 1000 elements is called FGA-35.

It needs to be clarified that there are two FGA-35. There is the early one you showed here shares the same twin T-R architecture ( which poses maintenance issue ) with FGA-29 and there is the updated FGA-35 with 3D technology aka flat or linear T-R architecture which i showed here.

Hope that clarifies .

i also need to make a report about the HMD on the 35

since the lines will always point up
image

1 Like

image

image

3 Likes

they will butcher it on release like all mig 29s. Can’t have a mig29 above 15% of its power

2 Likes

There is no proof that data is presented by MiG. Table appears at the end and is edited over by someone. On top of that, as i said, MiG-35 physically is incapable of carrying 4 R-27ERs so this already puts a giant question mark over validity of this table

All these fictional camos while Ukraine actually uses digital camos
Missed opportunity tbh

While all issues matter, i would have prefered for the snail team do the funny with ‘fixing’ this… would have changed up things a bit

image
Phazotron calls it FGA29 in their radar booklet from a while back.

There are no two FGA-35s the one that shares acrhcitecture with FGA-29 is FGA-29 but now with originally planned amount of TRMs installed in it. This was literally said by representatives of Phazotron back in 2008, radar installed in 9.15D version of MiG-35 was a testbed with reduced amount of TRMs to prevent the loss of entire set if something goes wrong

In their defense, I’m unsure of how far base Kh-35 really went, but it’d be nice to see it added to like, Yak-141, 9.15 and Su-39 maybe… The things that would’ve carried it ofc.

Although I’m still disappointed they just slapped Kh-35s on everything.

1 Like

Do you have that full booklet I can’t seem to find where I saved it

i have the exact same issue

i lost it a while ago

but i recognize the background of it

image
hmmm

1 Like

I hate you
Why is it mounted like that

1 Like