funnily it is called N010A in the files instead of N010AE
OLS-U and OLS-UM ( along with their export UE/UEM variants ) are made by NPK-SPP based in Moscow.
KOLS 13SM-1 is made by UOMZ based as the name suggests in the Urals more precisely Yekaterinburg.
OLS-U is made for MiG-29K/KR ( as attested by the official MiG JSC brochure below ). The upgraded OLS-UM is made for MiG-35. As far as i understand 13SM-1 was offered by UOMZ for the MiG-35 as competition to OLS-UM but the latter won the competition.
Who thinks this report is gonna pass?
(Asking for OVT TVC on MiG-35)
1 Like
no way
also its everybodies favorite Fulcrum-F
Yes from KRET ( parent company of Phazotron who make the radar ).
By the way OAK states that an AESA with 160km range is installed which would be FGA-35 https://uacrussia.ru/ru/aircraft/lineup/military/mig-35/ but i highly doubt Gaijin will change the radar at this point. FGA-29 is fine anyways.
From official MiG presentation in 2017 it can carry x8 R-77 :
1 Like
Where it states?
I really wish I could speak Russian and watch this.
Maybe @GitGood could confirm if it mentions x8 R-77?
9-15d have 8 of them, 9-41sr have 6, but there are no reliable sources publicly available that can confirm this. also you can always refer to technical compatibility with 9-15d, the limitation of 6 missiles is purely due to the fire control system, meanwhile we have the SU-30MKI with KH-38, which could not be present in the fire control system
Crazyyyyyyyyy
Thats very scuffed and not checked data, it says up to 4 27R/T/ER/ET which is blatantly wrong
Also 4 R-60M that are completely obsolete and most likely taken from 9.31 data
I literally showed a photo of the most recent FGA-29 dish with increased amount of TRMs
Bro wanted proofs from me about Sura angles being 70 degrees because of the missiles and when I showed him НСЦИ-КОС table for guiding angles completely ignored right table with 120 degrees, truly a man of wisdom
What are the differences between the OLS-U and UM even? I have seen primary sources saying this aircraft line is equipped with both versions, and so far i have not seen any performance specification on the UM/UEM
1 Like
i assume this can used to change its name to FGA-35 or 29, i just dont want it named N010AE in game lmao
Seems to be mostly design improvements that would matter IRL like 120B using solid state electronics over 120A but in-game they are pretty much identical
I love how people are confidently wrong about MiG-35 in dev server cathegory of forum