and if i remember right the manual doesn’t say weather, wind, pilot skill so on.
and also the overperforming isn’t that much its any need to change , you also have f-16, f-5e and bunch of other planes that are overperforming by a landslide.
also war thunder uses the 1.5 or 2 maximum-G multiplying rule, witch ofc would make the time to do a full circle take less time.
also crew level is a thing
The person who has it won’t release it to us or Gaijin but let us see a singular paper discussing sustained AoA up to 33 degrees and use of R-73.
I had a brainfart the way I read it.
All the time you’re posting and nothing productive is being said.
That is by far out of order.
The truth of the matter is the truth whether it is written or not. The MiG-25 has similar issues with turn rate.
I think it should be fixed, the report is already made. However consider the F-5E which they refuse to fix not for any of the reasons you listed - but rather because the F-5 series is turning a profit and they don’t want to nerf them. Simple as that.
They aren’t multiplying performance in any way shape or form. If the aircraft pulled 1.5x safe G load in real life the performance should match the aircraft when pulling similar G’s in-game. The difference is that the real life airframe would not likely fly again after the following landing.
I doubt it would be in the same manual, even as an insert.
The MLD has slats and the saw tooth vortex generators at the wing root, among other small aerodynamical changes. It should also have a different RWR and a new radar with supposedly a much simplified workload for the pilot.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/O28RWTHQkYvi
In terms of radar workload it has automatic switching between passive interference modes, which were modes that used the doppler effect to not lock chaff when mti was not available.
This modes are completely missing in warthunder and would basically make the radar as effective if not more than before the update.
Gaijin, instead of fixing the radar, decided to buff the fm to unrealistic leveles.
We know where to find it, and who has it. They will not hand it over to us because they are saving it for their DCS mod of the Razbam MiG-23ML module.
It is not performing as it should - though we cannot say how far it is off. We do not know the formula for converting indicated AoA to true AoA for the MiG-23MLD though I assume it is probably the same formula as for MiG-29 since they use the same FCS. If that is the case, it is underperforming somewhat in available AoA and stability in-game as it can only handle around 24-26 degrees.
