That will push them to 13.0.
R-73s on a good platform would not be balanced at 12.7, because then it becomes closer to a Gripen or F-16 with only 9Ms.
It would simply be overpowered at 12.7, and I don’t understand how people think it wouldnt be.
yeah and it should also be a user’s right to say when another user is chronically wrong and saying outlandish things unless you are fine with trolls and/or people muddying the waters in every thread (what am I saying, of course you guys are fine with that)
2 Likes
Maybe 13.0 assuming TT goes up. Otherwise no way.
They honestly need to make a rule against ragebaiting imo.
1 Like
Ragebaiting and trolling is a rule violation already.
I already unintentionally follow the rules cause I’m exclusively sincere and only address posts, not people.
im a little late to this discussion but i do agree the mig-29 needs to be looked at and reconfigured.
i find a good idea is for the german and hungary mig-29 9.12 remove the r-27er since they were also not exported and add the r-27r1 but keep the r-60m and bring them down to 12.3br.
this can also be done for the russian mig-29 9.13 if they would add the mig-29s 9.13s with r73 and r-27er
bring down the mig-29g and mig-29s 9.13s (r-73 version) to 12.7br.
i agree 12.7 and 13.0 are the correct br for the mig-29 but the problem is br compression at 13.0br. at 13.0 everyone takes a Su-33 or Su-27.
orrr they all get the r-73 and the r-27er at 12.7br. idk what to do with the mig-29g then. maybe give it fox3 like the smt but it’s hard to find info on the mig-29g. all i know is nato standard.
The Mig-29G in its current form should be at 13.0 with R-73s and R-27ERs. It’s main issue is the BR compression at that tier, but outside of that it’s fine.
I wouldn’t mind if the earlier German and Hungarian ones went to 12.3, because I think they would be too good at 12.7 with R-73s.
I’m not sure what to do with the Russian variant.