It’s almost like the plane with higher turnrate, better low speed responsibility and thrust is the better plane and Alvis has no clue what he’s talking about.
2 Likes
Further context and correction: You are trash at 1v1, but even then, on the Mirage you are able to win against me in a bo3, wich shows that M2K>>>>>>>>>MiG-29
And now @Grossaaaa claims @Leinadmix9_ツ and I don’t know what we’re talking about despite us saying the same exact thing for 1v1s.
Who would have thought
Dude, Gross is calling you a liar.
Don’t drag him in there, never said that he is wrong. I am also not a duelist, but @Leinadmix9_ツ and I can duel and we’ll probably see the same result.
What kind of gaslight is this Alvis? He is literally saying that I was right all along(???)
You just did.
Me: “Mirage 2000 is better in 1v1s.”
You: “You’re wrong.”
Prove the Mirage 2000 isn’t better in 1v1s or acknowledge Lein and I were correct.
Man ran out of wrong statistics to prove his nonexistent point so he’s now trying to gaslight. Anyway, you up for a duel?
1 Like
Sure, but results will be tha same
@Grossaaaa
No one’s gaslighting:
Not my fault you didn’t read this graph earlier that proves me right about Mirage 2000 being better in 1v1s.
You never wrote the word “compression” in the sentences I quoted, and stating that the 29G and SMT are under-BR’d is pure and utter nonsense.
Tell your programmer to do a better job next time, AI.
1 Like
Sorry, small correction: I was right and you were wrong since you said M2K was worse than MiG-29
-us duelists- lmfao
Gaslighting hard man.
2 Likes
In air modes.*
I never said 1v1s outside the graph which I said Mirage 2000 was better in.
@Leinadmix9_ツ For air modes.*
Mirage 2000 is better in 1v1s, do you and @Grossaaaa agree with me or not?
As I expect.