This just in: F-111, F-105, fighters because of their names! More at 11!
the F111 was made as a multirole to fill all needs
F-105 was a fighter bomber
the sea harriers were only ever used as fighters and anti ship
The gr3 and gr7 and gr9 were the strike aircraft
FRS: fighter, reconnaissance, strike
And the 111 and 105 being fighters, lol
Plus, this is getting completely off-topic.
The MiG-21bis LAZUR-M is a decent, but not good aircraft, deserving neither 10.7 nor 11.3 nor any additional new armaments that it never used.
and it was never used for strike that why the next one was designated FA2
it is the naval fighter
because it has S in the name does make it a solely strike aircraft
Cuz that’s the only web that’s legit
I have new titles for next update fun/hard check them out
the radar you’re talking about was only introduced to MiG-21-93, MiG-21 Lance-R and MiG-21 Bison
the new AAMs are those from the MiG-21-93 Upgrade
none of that were introduced or could be used by the MiG-21Bis with Lazur-M Avionics
most things are better then a tornado …
Wikipedia isnt a source accepted by Gaijin .
I’d say it’s harder to find sth that’s worse than a Tornado at the BR
Is a website that anyone can modify its source considered reliable in your opinion?
It would be higher than 12.0 with that load out. It’s fine how it is.
it would no longer be a MiG-21Bis with that Loadout
Ya. Where is this information even coming from?
maverick’s or mine?
Maverick’s information is from wikipedia, mine is from looking at this forum and their respective sources
“This vehicle needs to be fixed. Let’s invent new radar stats for it and give it missiles that it never carried.”
Mavericks. What wikipedia tho bc I tried to find it and I couldn’t.
idk, I thought some National (German) wikipedia had just all weapons from all versions (including MiG-21-93) compiled into one list
they must’ve changed it, the German Wikipedia im so used to now has it accurately spread out by version
wikipedia probably read this post, thought jup our readers are dumb as rocks and corrrected it
Good point