MiG-21bis "Lazur-M" fix

This just in: F-111, F-105, fighters because of their names! More at 11!

the F111 was made as a multirole to fill all needs
F-105 was a fighter bomber

the sea harriers were only ever used as fighters and anti ship
The gr3 and gr7 and gr9 were the strike aircraft

images-54
H4

This is a naval fighter

FRS: fighter, reconnaissance, strike
And the 111 and 105 being fighters, lol

Plus, this is getting completely off-topic.
The MiG-21bis LAZUR-M is a decent, but not good aircraft, deserving neither 10.7 nor 11.3 nor any additional new armaments that it never used.

and it was never used for strike that why the next one was designated FA2
it is the naval fighter

because it has S in the name does make it a solely strike aircraft

Cuz that’s the only web that’s legit

I have new titles for next update fun/hard check them out

the radar you’re talking about was only introduced to MiG-21-93, MiG-21 Lance-R and MiG-21 Bison
the new AAMs are those from the MiG-21-93 Upgrade

none of that were introduced or could be used by the MiG-21Bis with Lazur-M Avionics

most things are better then a tornado …

Wikipedia isnt a source accepted by Gaijin .

I’d say it’s harder to find sth that’s worse than a Tornado at the BR

1 Like

Is a website that anyone can modify its source considered reliable in your opinion?

It would be higher than 12.0 with that load out. It’s fine how it is.

1 Like

it would no longer be a MiG-21Bis with that Loadout

Ya. Where is this information even coming from?

maverick’s or mine?

Maverick’s information is from wikipedia, mine is from looking at this forum and their respective sources

“This vehicle needs to be fixed. Let’s invent new radar stats for it and give it missiles that it never carried.”

4 Likes

Mavericks. What wikipedia tho bc I tried to find it and I couldn’t.

idk, I thought some National (German) wikipedia had just all weapons from all versions (including MiG-21-93) compiled into one list

they must’ve changed it, the German Wikipedia im so used to now has it accurately spread out by version
wikipedia probably read this post, thought jup our readers are dumb as rocks and corrrected it

Good point