No the only major who got a comparable heli is the US and that one is a 540000rp new vehicle, not a mod.
Those same players with their BVMs and MI28NMs were also responsible for the lower winrates pre october. They did not magically become better just because October came around.
Dude i used 100% winrate in my calculation which is literally the best possible case for your theory and the math still didnt check out 70% is cutting it even less.
In my experience most of my matches the helis spawn first to clean the spaa and some tanks, and later comes the kh38 slingers. We shouldnt be forced to spawn 2 types of spaa to counter CAS (i dont have GE slot bought), also israel doesnt ahve saclos spaa lol.
I remember a time in Tunisia map when while playing germany I spawned with Flarak, cleaned the enemy helis but shortly after bombed with 3 planes carrying kh38.
I think ldircm still has a heavier role than anything in all of this than fnf weapons…… theres no way in September 25th lmurs get released and 5 days russian win rates just from an avg of 43 in august shot up to 50% in September avg.
Like in 5 days youre telling me enough games with lmur were played to completely change the avg with 25 days taken into account without lmurs
They got added in November for which we dont even have data yet.
Do you know how calenders work? The LMUR got added in September
How many times do i have to repeat myself? EVEN IF EVERY SINGLE ADDITIONAL GAME POST UPDATE COMPARED TO PRE UPDATE WAS A 100% WINRATE THE REST OF THE PLAYERS WOULD STILL NEED TO GO UP BY A SIGNIFICANT MARGIN TO MAKE THE JUMP. If you take your 70% winrate then about a third of all games played would need to have a 70% winrate if the rest stays the same as the month before
The LMUR got added in September please consult a calender before you comment.
Yes, new content, new update, more interest more games. Thats also why the september change is smaller and then in october when the update has its first full month the change gets bigger
I do get that but it doesn’t make sense, as the queues before the lmur update relatively stayed the same. Russia had already 100+ player queues when i logged on for august end and september beginning in the hypes for the Buk m3 and japan as well due to the new Oplot T.
I’m sorry but its impossible until a statshark dev can give us the massive difference of 25 days of non lmurs vs actually the win rates combined when lmurs dropped for September. that massive shot up of win rates that Russia had, from 43 of august to 50% in September were more combined factors than simply lmur.
Like i said, July it was at its lowest with 41% and the increase in wr had begun before lmur dropped.
it was a mix factors, Like ive said lmurs did play a part but not as heavily as Ldircm helis and just general large player theory.
And since their arrival russia continued to have simply large player numbers regardless
Anecdotes dont matter.
I did a bit of math. If we assume the August winrate for the first 25 days of September and the October winrate for the 5 last then to arrive at the actual september winrate wed need about 45% of games in 25 days and 55% in the last 5 which admittedly does sound unlikely.
However the increase of games/players is still too low to be the major cause of the winrate increase. The only way that theory would make sense was if Russia actively lost bad players post update and gained exclusively good players in their stead.
Im not disputing that there are very good people that chase the meta but frankly the narrative that thats the main driver of winrate increases is ridiculous and just excuses Gaijins terrible balancing atm.
During our testing, the mi-28nm was so hit or miss. In areas where the LDIRCM should’ve worked it didn’t, and in areas it shouldn’t have worked it did.
It was like a toss of the dice every time. It was so inconsistent.
Meanwhile the AH-64E and the China heli were consistent. They both blocked far more.
Major Nations include 3 different tech trees. How exactly do you see this as a good point to make? 2 out of 3 got an LDIRCM helicopter, and Germany likely doesn’t even have one to get.
They still have the missiles, which is what we were discussing to begin with. They might not be as strong as the US AH-64E, but they still carry the same weapons regardless, even when they shouldn’t.
I can assure you that despite them being played less, JAGMs are plenty capable at their job.
All I’m asking you to do is explain why the Mi-28NM had a 10% rise in win rate prior to the LMUR being added. Using capslock isn’t going to get you anywhere or convince anyone.
I’m not defending the Mi-28NM or the AH-64E here. I’m simply pointing out that your reason for disliking them is not factual. In a few months, the Mi-28NM spam will die down. It will still be strong, but players will inevitably go back to their favorite tanks to play.
This point makes little sense and contradicts your prior statements on the export AH-64E. While it is true that the LMUR did drop in September, it was only about the 24th when players could obtain it. Keep in mind that the Mi-28NM was the least-played top-tier helicopter the Russians had before Tusk Force, and many players skipped it in favor of the current META Russian Ka-52. This resulted in many players having to grind the vehicle or spade it after the update. Those who GE’d it aren’t significant enough to cover the first 23 days of September.
The Mi-28NM has always outperformed the Ka-52 even before the LMUR, because it had a more competent playerbase, yet still retained a 45-48% winrate before September. It’s not a friendly airframe to fly due to its weight and FM to begin with, so most players favored the Ka-52’s maneuverability and ridiculous damage model.
Despite this, you’re suggesting that the Mi-28NM somehow jumped Russia’s overall win rate from 47% to 58% in less than 7 days? Any reasonable player wouldn’t believe that.
slightly more than 6 days, which you still need to factor in the number of players who had to grind the Mi-28NM because they skipped it. Then you need to factor in the time to get the missile.
Yes, some people GE’d the helicopter and its missiles, but is that enough to jump a win rate by over 10% in 6 days?
I’m trying to explain here that the reason the helicopter is performing great right now isn’t only the LMUR, because it already performed better than the Ka-52. The fact that the LMUR was announced got the competitive players spamming it prior to Tusk Force.
The win rate between April and May did not change significantly despite LDIRCM. In June, the Russian win rate, before the new SAMS, actually tanked massively by about 10%.
The reason is that the competitive people boosting Russia’s performance switched to Germany and other nations to get their hands on the new shiny SPAA.