MI-28NM received DIRCM, protection against all missiles. DEV

They are still seriously affected by it, and it is down to sort of chance or angle whether some parts of the recognising features are still visible, they might well be lost and at which point it is down to IOG.

When fired km away the blind spot is smaller than u think.

It received LDIRCM which can now decoy everything. Even things that it should not.
We have sources from the manufacturer that show that the current implementation is wrong and things like the IRIS-T and IIR agms as well as TV AGMs should not be affected

2 Likes

The current in game model of the ka-52 has the LDIRCM pods not the dazzlers just a heads up

In the game, yes
Should they be? Not at all.

They are 5th generation missiles, and the manufacturer of the system warrants effectiveness only up against 3rd gen missiles

Huh. Well, if the module doesn’t have direct LOS to the incoming threat, then the threat can not be neutralised.
Simple as

that’s a Kh-35, an anti ship missile

the LMUR (izd305) will probably be added only as a spyke at first and recieve it’s MITL guidance when other munitions do.

They still should. I think u should have a look at what DIRCM looks like on thermals, literally a massive white spot. This could potentially block off all the IIR signatures which are used for tracking, thus track is lost. Sometimes they can even break IIR seekers, certain parts may even be burnt.

Anything along side similar alt is within field of view, anything above is obviously a different story, likely it is against MANPADS mostly.

especially with a LDIRCM that has a high enough output power

I mean we don’t specifically know but very well could break something especially vs long range launch where it gets a few seconds on target.

Actually the kh-38 is being tested on the 52M and they have been seen carrying KH-25 variants as well as the anti ship missiles you mentioned

1 Like

No, they should not.
Especially when we have primary sources stating that IRIS-T is immune to auch countermeasures.

Yes

my bad that is indeed a 38 (38MA specifically) but that’s a 52K

Which is impossible. It’s like saying ‘hey I can stare into a flashbang and not get blinded’. Sure u can still partially track, but afterall it is down to chance whether anything is visible by the seeker than keeps track. And like IRCCM vs flares, it’s not 100%, in fact far from that.

1 Like

Uhh yeah… wear sunglasses.
You can stare into the sun via a UV camera or a solar filter etc.
Nothing is impossible.

The LDIRCM is not claimed to be efffective against 5th generation missiles.
Only 3rd and below.

You seem to misunderstand…
IRIS-T is a type of missile that camnot be flared.
Even multispectral flares dont work against it.

Only FOV filling flares do. And those are still experimental and depend greatly on the angle of the incoming threat.

I dont know why you defend something that we have the sources to prove isnt as all powerful as gaijins implementation

1 Like

It is less effective, but still works.

Not if all signatures are covered by flares. IIR relies off a signature like a heli blade or a wing. If they are covered, no track is possible.

Proof?
Source?
I can share mine in dms if u want.

Yes and since covering the entire signature is so difficult for aircraft, it is a hard thing to do.

1 Like

IF they are COMPLETELY covered,yes. But that’s the problem because doing is is very hard and probably down to pure chance.

But let’s see what adjustments they make and what actually makes it to the live server.
Bug reports have been created and partially accepted, now we can only sit back and wait to see what the developers do with them.

2 Likes

Screenshot_2025_0610_160034
Here’s what dev have to say

Yeah basically theyre gonna let it remain broken until we complain loud enough for long enough.

7 Likes

It’s not a a system it’s a FORCE FIELD MADE BY GAIJIN

5 Likes

The AURA OF STALIN

3 Likes