Rear door of the Namer is not 30mm like modeled in game, but much thicker.
Armor blocks of the side armor on the Namers are not 50mm thin, but they fill up the entire empty space between the outside and the inner RHA. And again its SLERA and not NERA.
Does the screenshot in game looks like the photo? it’s too easy and it’s being ignored.
Weight.
Namer, was made from a Merkava.
IF THE MERKAVA MK4 IS 65 TONNES (which is not, and been proven by different IDF channels, its about 82 tonnes) HOW CAN A TURRETLESS CHASSIS OF THE MERKAVA, THAT WAS MADE TO BE EVEN MORE PROTECTED THAN THE MERKAVA ITSELF, BE 0.5 TONNES LIGHTER AND HAVE EVEN LESS ARMOR.
How is that making any sense that other APCs in the game weight 20-30 tons less and still got better side armor? if they keep the armor as NERA because its supposed be in urban combat then how can it have 50mm side armor?
Thats incredible actually! But seeing how much time it took to replace the Magach 7C side skirts to RHA (8 MONTHS), I doubt we’ll see a fix anytime soon :(
On the subject of Namer, is the complete absence of extra cannon belts in the hull realistic?
It’s hard to believe in all that space, there’s not room for a single extra belt. It’s very annoying getting hit in the turret, losing all your ammo and just being completely defenceless.
Just as the Merkavas and Namers don’t have the most interesting feature they had irl: the armor and the weight, Gaijin made the most unique feature the Su-39 have to be completely worthless: the capability of guiding Vikhrs with radar datalinks.
