Who shouldn’t?
Read what I’ve said entirely please…
This just goes to show how little people actually read anymore.
because it’s stated that it’s an official Mk. 4, with pretty much almost everything essential updated.
You again have chosen to ignore where the conversation went, I am already aware of that it’s a Mark 4 , it’s not in dispute, I was showing the Isreali news article whcih calls it a generation 5 MBT which is likely how people are starting to get confused and led to this mass sharing of it being a Mk5:
Please rather than respond to me with something which is completely irrelevant go back and actually read the damn conversation.
Yessir! Gaijin drop the Barak 🗣🗣
1 Like
Would be something nice ot see
Asking for proof and sources = anti Israel? What are you saying???
Gonna save this post WATCH
No, but that guy is in every damn post about israel asking for proof and discussing everything, even asking for proof about the turret armor not being at least +600mm ke protected wich for a 65 ton tank and that armor thickness its just a dumb question, and this guy wasnt the case but me as an israeli main its for me very common to see political radicaliced people hating on every damn aspect israel has even two i say " I play for the vehicles cuz they are good cuz i dont give a f… about politics"
2 Likes
Haha, starting to notice the Israel enjoyers just now?
I think it is pretty normal to ask about proof regarding any Israeli related claim and report, after all, at least in my opinion, it’s gotta be the most painful and hardest nation to find source material from, the second one would likely be China.
An example of this would be from my friends and my own experiences reporting issues regarding aircraft of the Israeli tech tree. See for example the entire debate over the Kfir C.10 Block 60 having or not having MAW.
Funnily enough, I’ve found most Israeli enjoyers to be quite polite in my experience, though it most likely stems from the fact that THIS FORUM IS MODERATED unlike other mediums such as Discord.
I really do hope the community at least stays as polite as it has been so far.
1 Like
Irl its 75+t
Look mate im not an israel “enjoyer” or as u say, ive had a post open for months just for gaijin to fix the trophy aps that didnt work even when the Namer tshrikhon got added to the game, we, israel players we play the nation more nerfed and unbalanced (we now we got a whole line of magach and that bs but the merkavas should be much more hard) mainly for a tank that compared to the rest of the tanks excels in armor and crew survivabilty. And im polite… dont try to difame me or what are you even trying (sorry if my writting is wrong, english isnt my main lenguage) but you need to understand that we at least wanting the turret to stop a modern apfsds like the merkava lic did on the dev server and as it does irl its not “israel enjoyer” its common sense, and a guy only talking to ask for proof for some things that are just dumb its diabolical. “Do you have proof why the merkava should stop an apfsds that pens over 400mm?” Its stupidity
Britain players: first time?
Stop fighting make love plap plap plap not war
2 Likes
If asking for proof or a source is a problem/crime to you… There’s a massive issue. Since when is being pro-empirical evidence anti-insert nation?? There is a serious issue with that kind of thinking. If someone said this under a US thread, or a Russian thread it would be called out. So I’m doing it myself.
Stop being anti-truth. The truth shouldn’t hurt you in a VIDEO GAME. Let alone in real life. That’s a BIG problem imo.
It’s impolite to attack players for asking for proof. That’s conspiracy theory level insanity. You can’t even ask for a source, or proof because it happens to be a special nation with special protections?? If it was a US, or Russian thread that would be attacked immediately lmao.
It’s not stupidity lmao. It’s like if I claimed to be your father without proof. Wtf kinda idea is it that you can make infinite unfounded claims, but asking for proof/source is an issue? Come tf off it. I’m tired of this weak mindset around truth.
Yeah buddy, weak mindset, as you say lord, thr thing here is the people like you just want the merkava ultra-nerfed, why tf u want me to give you proof when even the composite armor thats made of this tank isnt in the game cuz gaijin doesnt give af? Why a tank designed for crew survivabilty at all cost cant stand frontally a 3bm32?? Do u need source for that too? Nono, lets better up its weight to 80 tons, keep the amazing armor that gaijin gave us and all happy. Mate just look at the comparison image that guy that posted this on the first message, IM NOT SURE if thats a source/evidence of its armor but what i am sure is that Rafael and the IDF already talked about the SLERA and that the armor that we have in game its very, very unrealistic
Evidence is necessary either way.
What I want to say is that even if there was no evidence, considering game balance, the Merkava Mk4 series’ armor is too thin against BR, so adjustments are needed.
After considering game balance, we got armor reinforcement. But if evidence later emerges that the armor is too thin, we can adjust it again.
4 Likes
No one here can definitively clarify the correct information regarding the Merkaba’s specific armor.
Therefore, since there is no evidence that the armor is as thin as it currently is, nor any evidence that it is as hard as claimed in reality, adjustments should be made based on game balance.
3 Likes