As far as I know, early in the game, T90A there was a period of cannonball from 3BM42M replaced with 3BM 46 to 3BM60。
I thought since t80bvm and the other two t80u t80uk both are modified models.
Then why? T80BVM cannot have 3BM 46?
You want to give them 3BM46 as stock shell or you want to take away 3BM60 ?
He probably wants both so he can reload his 3BM46 in 6s.
The presence or absence of supplies is irrelevant. Only the technical feasibility of using the weapon is important
I think there is a language problem here…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DYtXuFH2K7l2
Only two words are missing. This sentence is actually said by the community administrator
Probably just have it as an option as its either 3BM42 or 3BM60 currently, 3BM46 would be a middle ground between reload speed and pen
He probably thought that u said one of the two and u meant it’s supply problems, which Russia does have in a certain event we are not allowed to talk about, but yeah 3BM46 in 6s might actually be better than 3BM60 in 6.4.
I really learned today, that 3BM60 has a longer reload time then the other darts, nice.
1 Like
Its a longer dart so you need another round between each one so the tips don’t hit in the autoloader if I understand correctly. so it can only be loaded as every second round increasing cycle time.
This is strange to me, like if you want that 6s reload, why not play the T-80U?
I don’t see a problem of giving 3BM46 to T-80BVM tbh, 0.4sec faster reload but worse armor pen seems like an option for a player
If the nvd is clearer and the turret spins faster, oh, and the new explosive-reactive armor
I mean if it’s an option, why not.
Personally i would still go with 3BM60 though.
Mango m and vant are options for 550 and 530