+1 Give me more lend-lease vehicles for USSR!
2 Likes
anyone saying no is being petty.
The soviets quite liked matilda and valentine tanks
Lend-lease vehicles are welcome to representation in other trees to their native tree
Id love to see more matildas in the game, they are brilliant tanks and worthy of appearing more
5 Likes
AH YES! make british tree less unique and just not worthy of playing! Such a bad and stupid idea. The soviet union has enough of its own tanks in game and that can be added, so i think it does not need copy paste vehicles from minor tech trees. The devs should add more matilda variants to the British Tree, and not to the soviet!
4 Likes
I am fine with only for Event/Battlepass Vehicle or some limited offer maybe?
Just like Soviet Valentine, which sells only on Valentine’s Day.
2 Likes
YES. We need more and more of our vehicles. Couldn’t agree more.
But in the meantime, I think adding soviet Matilda isn’t hurting the uniqueness of the British TT if we only sell it on a specific period (Just like Soviet Valentine tank sales in Valentines does)
How about runs sales only events at the date of the Declaration of Lend-Lease act
with some other discounts on Lend-Leased vehicles in gamewides as extra?
3 Likes
This is much more sane idea than just putting it right to the TT, but i just dont like the idea of copying something unique and accualy good from the British 2nd era, and putting it into somethig else. The soviet tree does not need it, and it should be getting soviet tanks and not the British ones becouse what even is the point of British TT when you can just play their tanks in the soviet TT? In summary add soviet tanks to the soviet TT and British to the British TT, and if you realy need another not soviet tank in the soviet tree, then at least give something back to the British, like T-34 or somethig.
2 Likes
Well, I don’t dislike your Idea either, it is also fair and reasonable, and understandable.
but in a different point of view, I guess.
For me, I like Matilda tanks too, but I want more and more players to enjoy their Matildas too.
Don’t worry about that.
with a little bit of joke, our friends from Easts are ready, and will bring some fancy soviet vehicles to us as a sub-tree.
We already have some of them!
I was going to mention, Britain got India, so Soviet lend lease shouldn’t be an issue.
Well, There are quite a much of ours who dislike India as Subtree but want ANZAC or Canada instead.
Also dislikes Soviet C&P either.
(I am fine with India as a subtree of UK as long as they also bled for King and country before, and still maintaining closer relationships with us. unless Players from India want an independent TT instead. If they want Independent TT just like Israel does, I also understand that opinion too. )
So, I think both opinions are reasonable.
1 Like
And i think that they should not be added in the first place because they are not even Indian - if i want to play a T-90 then i should be playing soviet tree and not the British.
Nowhere did the OP mention this vehicle being proposed as a tech-tree researchable vehicle.
The USSR has the SU-57, Valentine, M3 Lee, Matilda (with a Russian-made 76 mm gun),and M4A2 as premium vehicles in its ground vehicles tree. Based on this pattern, I’m certain that newer lend-lease vehicles will also come as premiums, regardless.
Also, the USSR should receive lend-lease vehicles like this one, as well as others that had meaningful service with the Red Army. The point is to add more flavor to the game. I would love to see more Matilda variants for both the UK and the USSR.
I voted +1 for all lend-lease vehicles for the USSR because I enjoy mixing domestic and lend-lease vehicles in my ground lineup. This allows me to historically roleplay as one of the Red Army units that actually used those vehicles in real life.
2 Likes
so america should get mig 21 and mig 23 and T90m ? and pantsir ?
1 Like
along with me262 tiger 2 list goes on yoou get the point
1 Like
why not both? it was a lend lease vehicle and we have a hell of a lot of domestic stuff to keep the British tree unique. britain isn’t losing anything by having the vehicles it gifted out going where they were gifted
3 Likes
Neither of these were ever captured in functional condition. Only fake headlines claiming we did.
The USAF-captured MiG-21, MiG-23, and other Soviet aircraft were used by the 4477th Test and Evaluation Squadron. These aircraft were never deployed in any combat operations outside of the United States.
I cannot speak for the T-90M and Pantsir, but it seems they were only evaluated to gather information and were never used in active service.
I fail to see how these vehicles are relevant to this discussion, especially since the Soviet-operated Matilda did see combat, unlike the aforementioned vehicles.
1 Like
Indian pantsir soon tho
they didnt see combat so not really
That’d be funny, seeing if the deal actually holds up is another question.