What is the point of giving us 1 map ban and “dislikes” and “likes”
Can we just get more map BANS instead of whatever dislike and like is?
7 Likes
I prefer to have unlimited number of likes and dislikes.
That way, the ones who count these stats, will see the more accurate popularity of maps.
11 Likes
That wont happend any time soon, gajin needs to make a fustrating gameplay experience on shit maps/mods so you can grind more
10 Likes
Everybody having multiple map bans plays havoc with the matchmaker and increases queue times apparently.
2 Likes
Then they sure made matchmaker pretty incapable, then.
Frankly, I’d be in favor of letting premiums just ban every map except for one.
I don’t think think many would be going that far as to ban almost all the maps anyway.
And the few that would, well, they can get a disclaimer after a MM loading for a minute:
“If you are experiencing long matchmaking time, consider reviewing your map ban settings.”
I don’t think I actually want to ban any one map.
What I would like is to able to ban specific versions of a map (and every single onle of the red zoned narrow funnel maps).
A random example from Volokolamsk:
6 Likes
Yep ,a game with many faults
I dont ,I just hate that red line shite as I know you do.I think we are pretty easy going guys pushed too far.
1 Like
remeber we as a community (and customers) still have the power not give gaijin our money, if they are doing a bad job. I think we should use this power more often, not only regarding maps.
2 Likes
Wait, premium players only get 1 ban? Damn, man, that’s some F2P level of options (that I’d use gladly, of course)
One ban means we already up to 32 maps banned in a given lobby. Upping that to three per player would be 96 maps banned, which obviously isn’t viable.
I would love to see unlimited, or at least increased Likes/Dislikes though. They don’t seem to affect matchmaking and as has been said this would make their main role of providing feedback much more useful/representative.
3 Likes
What you’re saying doesn’t really make any sense. It’s like you’re assuming that every player in the queue needs a map that none of them have banned. Allowing players to ban more than one map won’t make much difference. A little yes, but not much.
I agree, I would rather give them more information to run off of. Maybe include a section for removed maps and allow us to tally up those as well. Some may come back if enough people are allowed to voice how much they liked them.
2 Likes
Nope, it’s already been stated multiple times by Gaijin the current system already greatly affects map selection.
3 Likes
I think it is just… easy cop-out on their end.
Since, I think it would not be too difficult to implement, just a bit tedious.
But of course, in their eyes, it is just needless effort.
maybe a vote ban? The maps with the most dislikes for each team are banned.
I’d love to be able to ban Sands of Sinai, Campania, Carpathia all at once. Hate all of those maps.
Already exists, 3 dislikes across both teams is the same as a ban.
oh, I didn’t knew this. But I think one ban for each team would be nice.
Add map bans to sim ground please.
Then they need to revamp the system, it would make much more sense to have the player (s) wait until the next match that the particular player doesn’t have banned instead of factoring in an entire lobby if bans.