This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
4 Likes
i dont think you have put the slightest bit of thought into what youre saying lmao, the lavad is at the tier it is because of its Anti Tank capability, against aircraft its wholly outmatched but just about every other anti air at the br, if stingers got fixed it would just mean its better against aircraft which would do absolutely nothing to make it go up in br because its perfectly in line with other systems, and again the strela would be better because it has both more lock range and better flare resistance.
did you think about this for more than 2 seconds?
1 Like
It’s at the current BR because of it’s overall performance, both against air and ground included.
Giving Stingers a really sizeable buff would result in LAV-AD performing better overall, thus getting it’s BR increased.
I suggest you read up on how Gaijin balances vehicles in this game before spewing out ignorant statements.
nope against Air targets its equal to the 9.7 machbet lmao.
my brother in christ, the lavad is currently 10.0, the strela is 10.3, thats where it would go, no higher. the lavad performs abysmally in the air to air role, stats shows that, and in the ground to ground role it has pretty abysmal stats much the same.
youre talking absolute nonsense if you genuinely think buffing stingers to be slightly worse than strelas would mean lavad would jump 10.7+.
1 Like
They just care about the illusion of accuracy more than actual accuracy. If people believe misinformation enough that the average person thinks it’s true, that’s alright with them.
F-16AJ as example
The “F-16AJ” in-game is based on the latest F-16J proposal competing with the F-15J. It was never built or tested, but based on unrelated earlier Sparrow tests for the F-16 that at the time were discarded by the USAF.
This would’ve been a variant of the early F-16 integrating many changes based on the YF-16 Sparrow testbed with the goal of matching Japans requirements that got the basic F-16 disqualified by this point. For this the capability to carry a loadout of eight air to air missiles (4x IR, 4x SARH) was required and the multirole capability and low cost were meant to outcompete the F-15J and F-14JMost obvious issues in game are that instead of an F-16AJ model it uses the basic Block 10, it’s missing half of the SARH missile loadout, it’s missing TV guided GBU-8 bombs despite those being on other early F-16s and the F-16J brochure and it uses the F100-PW-220 engine that didn’t exist at the time instead of the accurate F100-PW-200 found in actual F-16s then.
Still, when many of these issues were called out, they put out this statement, talking about prototypes that didn’t exist (confused with YF-16 Sparrow tests) and altering it based on the F-16ADF that wouldn’t even start development until a decade later for an entirely different purpose than the F-16J.
3 Likes
going from 10.0 to 11.0 doesn’t make sense considering the 2S6 stands at 10.7. Worst case is that it goes to 10.7. Most likely, it would go to 10.3. And if it still over performs, then it would go up in BR.
BR changes increment by 0.3. That’s what they’ve done for the majority of vehicles introduced. The only exception I can think of is the BMPT which went from 10.3->10.7->11.3->11.7. So unless you think the stinger change will bring the LAVAD to the same level as the BMPT in terms of it being unbalanced, I highly doubt it would get a full BR raise.
1 Like
Read my sentence again.
Stingers being slightly worse than Strela would definitely put LAV-AD at 11.0 as it’s far more than just an empty shell, unlike Strela.
Not even that much. Properly modeled Stingers wouldnt be any better than the Strela at 10.3, and I would be hardpressed to figure out why they would go above 10.0, where things like the Stormer AD and LAV-AD are already
3 Likes
Best*
BMPT moved up by four BR steps.
Yes and each time it was moved up, it was monitored closely to see if it even needing raising in BR which is the point I’m making here. It won’t jump to 10.7 without Gaijin monitoring the vehicle first.
I’m curious why do you think it’s 11.0 material?
I never said it needs to jump to 11.0 in a single update, as monitoring things throughout the months and moving them up step by step is always better and safer.
It really depends how strong Stingers would be in comparison to Strela.
If they’re extremely similar, then all of the LAV’s auxiliaries it offers over Strela definitely are worth more than a single BR step.
If all its “auxiliaries” were good enough to justify it being higher then it would already be higher. Looking at something like the Falcon, only really at 8.3 and not 7.3 because of its “auxiliaries” performance.
The only thing of factor to consider then is the Anti-Air performance. In this case Stinger vs Strela.
1 Like
This is already why its 10.0 there is no reason why they would become more valuable if stingers were buffed…
As i said the AA perfomance is IDENTICAL to the machbet, arguably worse than the Gepard 1a2.
What ?
LAV-AD is definitely higher now than what it would’ve been without them.
Vehicle as a whole would be more valuable with Stingers getting buffed, I have no idea how you still can’t wrap your head around this simple thing.
I see what you did there
Not to the extent of being 0.7 higher, let alone 1.0
It would basically be a Strela equivalent, which western manpads are tbh, so 0.3 increase
2 Likes
You have just proven my point…
Stingers are largely on 9.3/9.7 platforms. Platforms that are a little more capable put them at 10.0. Stormer AD and LAV-D vs Gepard 1A2 for example.
But neither would be 10.7 or 11.0 with current Stinger or without stinger. So why would their BR increase because of the other parts of the performance?
If stinger was brought up to parity with Strela. Then the highest it would be is 10.3 alongside the Strela. So at most I would only see a 0.3 BR increase for all Prox-fuse stinger carriers.
The other important thing is that there are multiple variants of stingers that cumulatively increase performance, so just because a launcher has access to the -92K at the moment doesn’t mean it would post overhaul should it be determined to be an issue.
Also the ATAL should also be able to take later stingers too
And it should also defeat L-DIRCM too.
5 Likes
Hang on a second, lets turn this situation around so you can maybe realize how ridiculous your statement actually is.
If Strela had Stingers it should only drop down by a single BR step ?
Do you think that Strela with Stingers would have the same overall performance as LAV-AD ?
Do you think that Strela with Stingers would have better overall performance than Gepard 1A2 ?
It’s like saying 120S should be at the same BR as M1A1 because their rounds are the same thus being equivalents, while totally ignoring other things that have an impact on vehicle’s overall performance.
Because the overall performance matters ?
You’re straight up ignoring all other benefits things like LAV-AD have over Strela.
If Stingers were brought up to parity with Strela, LAV-AD should never be at the same BR as Strela because it’d then be an objectively better vehicle overall.