So we can just ignore how Germany was already doing pretty good but nah, it’s obviously all due to the 2A7V that they went from sub-50% WR to over 60%+ despite the tank not even being in the game yet.
You are right i don’t have it, but i play against it and know what it is capable of.
So you threw out an unsupported claim, refused to take it back despite clearly being in the wrong whilst acting like you’ve got the moral high ground - and at the end of it, admitted that that it’s based on your personnal (anecdotal) experience of fighting against it rather than having it?
Italia has better win rate because much less people play them, and these few people play a lot better than average guy
About believing this dude or not:
Abrams getting reload buff correlates with his statistics
What point in making this up? If you think he made it so ussr gets buff, well it will not get it no matter what because people on forums will cry + their tanks are already alright
Funky, so people can’t even comment & post about their favourite vehicle being obviously modelled badly, because some guy LARPing as the renowed chess grandmaster will swoop by, and himself cry about you complaining.
No one was crying about Leopard2A7V performance, people constantly complained about its armor performance and 3D model which was completely fair considering how butchered it is.
On the other hand you came in here started to complain about how Russian vehicles general performance was actually inferior to their counterparts while in reality it is quite the opposite.
Considering how many times you complained about Russian line-up its normal to forget that kind of things.
-Best Spaa
-Best Support Vehicles
-Best Helicopters
-One of the best Fixed Wing Cas
-Has quite good Mbts
But somehow they are not good compare to other Nato line-ups?
Italy and Israel doesnt even have top tier Spaa systems
-Merkava’s are compeletly butchered in terms of armor protection,same as Ariete’s
-Britian and Israel doesnt even have support vehicles for top tiers.
It takes special effort to ignore those hard facts but guess i shouldnt be surprised.
That’s funny, because Germany wasn’t the only nation picking up momentum either - you didn’t actually pay any attention to anybody’s bug GER & RUS’ WRs when checking out wt’s heatmap, to put it bluntly; it was a group effort (excluding US) - so what actually correlates with Russia’s decline, is that everyone but US (and Russia itself) began to play better. By the way, did you notice that they’ve already bounced back , and by “they’ve” I mean Russia, they’re already at 58% WR.
I mean i said something and immediatly got attacked personaly and it’s still going on. You can’t have a discussion with a different view in here.
Oh gee, you’re clueless. You bulldoze your way into a thread that’s in the middle of a heated discussion about the way a certain MBT is modelled, and you call the people participating in it “crybabies” whilst acting like doing that is completely justified - playing the victim are we? Oldest trick in the scroll.
Their mbts more then enough to do the job, if you wanna see really bad MBTS you can check Merkava’s and Ariete’s as i mentioned before.
Which means core problem is the Russian player base, despite having better line-up they cant catch up with nations who has objectively worse line-ups (which was my original point).
