Making Russian Tank Protection more realistic

Would pretty much mean that the bow fuel tanks will be fully capable of being spall traps, I cant count the number of times they just choose to detonate instead of doing this.

It would heavily reduce the usability of one of the main T series weakpoints, that being their LFP.

How about using stats from November? Of course not, they disprove your claim after all.

image

And here’s stats from 1st of December:

image

You believe what you want to.

I have both of them, it’s not a matter of believing - I know Pantsir is much better, it’s a statement of fact.

On the other hand, you don’t have the FlaRakRad, so it’s you who is believing what you want in, you’re a hypocrite.

3 Likes

Dude, a round with an anti-ERA tip and 600mm+ pen will go through it, it doesn’t need documentation/evidence, all it needs is pure common sense and the knowledge of the state of the Russian Armed Forces.

3 Likes

So you are saying im right ? Got it

Mixed it up with T72B3 sorry, T80 indeed has decent mobility, but limited by 3BM46 nonetheless.

All the Bias code and handholding and the average IvanBoo still can’t get consistent wins?

Ironic.

1 Like

image

Re-read this.

People will look at this for US and simply say US players suck without looking at the actual vehicles and actually attempt to figure out the issue.

And from 2 months later when a lot of people probably got the new tanks, total coincidence
image

You are right i don’t have it, but i play against it and know what it is capable of.

Cant argue with someone who doesnt have flarakrad while im constantly using both of them.

I like your lame excuses, find me single reply where i mentioned Russian Bias while i was replying to you, im waiting.

Sounds like skill issue especially if we take your claim about T-80U’s mobility.

Guess what T-80BVM has enough reverse speed while having one of the best gun handling and only matched by Leopard2’s.

Quite the opposite, my claims were straight from the beginning Meanwhile you came in here and started to complain and cry just like you did on Leopard2A7V thread.

Whew lad, a 5% improvement?

image

So we can just ignore how Germany was already doing pretty good but nah, it’s obviously all due to the 2A7V that they went from sub-50% WR to over 60%+ despite the tank not even being in the game yet.

You are right i don’t have it, but i play against it and know what it is capable of.

So you threw out an unsupported claim, refused to take it back despite clearly being in the wrong whilst acting like you’ve got the moral high ground - and at the end of it, admitted that that it’s based on your personnal (anecdotal) experience of fighting against it rather than having it?

Man, you’re incorrigible.

4 Likes

Italia has better win rate because much less people play them, and these few people play a lot better than average guy
About believing this dude or not:

  1. Abrams getting reload buff correlates with his statistics
  2. What point in making this up? If you think he made it so ussr gets buff, well it will not get it no matter what because people on forums will cry + their tanks are already alright

2 Likes

Yea, i also said T80BVM is the only real viable MBT at the momebt, but i guess you convienently forgot about that.

I said that it is ridicilous of them crying even though they have by far the best tank at the moment. If you see that as crying, be my guest.

It’s about the ussr winrate magicly decreasing apprently without reason.

Funky, so people can’t even comment & post about their favourite vehicle being obviously modelled badly, because some guy LARPing as the renowed chess grandmaster will swoop by, and himself cry about you complaining.

Got it.

3 Likes

Jeez you guys need serious anger treatment.

And here it is, the goalpost has been changed - from Germany’s ~68% winrate to Russia’s WR declining!

Jeez you guys need serious anger treatment.

All I’m doing is pointing out the levels your hypocrisy has reached, don’t like it?

4 Likes

No one was crying about Leopard2A7V performance, people constantly complained about its armor performance and 3D model which was completely fair considering how butchered it is.

On the other hand you came in here started to complain about how Russian vehicles general performance was actually inferior to their counterparts while in reality it is quite the opposite.

Considering how many times you complained about Russian line-up its normal to forget that kind of things.

1 Like

Yes, because it corelates.

I mean i said something and immediatly got attacked personaly and it’s still going on. You can’t have a discussion with a different view in here.

Iam not complaining, i am saying it’s not as good as NATO line up in the current meta, which is true for MBT’s.

Bruh, Russian line-up has:

-Best Spaa
-Best Support Vehicles
-Best Helicopters
-One of the best Fixed Wing Cas
-Has quite good Mbts

But somehow they are not good compare to other Nato line-ups?

  • Italy and Israel doesnt even have top tier Spaa systems
    -Merkava’s are compeletly butchered in terms of armor protection,same as Ariete’s
    -Britian and Israel doesnt even have support vehicles for top tiers.

It takes special effort to ignore those hard facts but guess i shouldnt be surprised.

6 Likes