Gaijin: We don’t play our own game. We ignore player feedback and balance vehicles based purely on how much money they make!
These are the same developers who moved the Iranian F-14 up to 13.7 while leaving the clearly overperforming Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2 untouched.
i saw f4j in the battle rating changes and thought ohhh finally. but it turns up, its only ground battle
they didnt touched a single phantom in air rb
can you make a proposal in the new br topic post?
Thanks for the support man but I think it’s over. Gaijin doesn’t give a shit about the phantoms
They arent playing their own game, crazy. The F4S is a little more balacend at 12.0 but the f4juk defentliy not
Maybe with decompression
That’s not flight model data, that’s team skill data.
@HazelPam7769, @Tymxy.
They probably use stats of F-4J/S to balance F-4J(UK)
I don’t have solid proof, but only this can explain why Gaijin believes F-4J(UK) is fine, and all three of those are sharing the same BR in EVERY game mode despite the fact that F-4J(UK) is worse than other 12.0(ARB) Phantoms in Air sim.
No AIM-7F, no Spey engines. but have higher BR than F-4K/M in air sim and has the same BR as F-4J/S.
I’ve honestly given up on it at this point. They just keep giving me the same recycled excuses. Meanwhile, the Iranian F-14 is being moved up to 13.7, yet the Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2 are staying at 13.3. That alone says a lot about their priorities. They clearly don’t care about the British Phantoms. At times, it genuinely feels like they don’t even play their own game, especially when they continue to ignore years of feedback about how poor the F-4J(UK) is. A lot of people have already said they’d be perfectly happy with the FGR.2 moving to 12.3 if it received the same missile loadout as the tornado F.3 at 12.0. Instead, we’ll probably be waiting another few years before they even consider moving it back down, or, more likely, they’ll forget about the FGR.2 altogether, leaving it as one of the weakest aircraft at 12.3.
Have fun fighting the Su-30s.
Well you wouldnt be wrong there ngl, I have a feeling some of them havent touched 12.0-12.7 in a while
Iirc they are carried in the outer wing pylons, 2 of them would be fine like the bol on the premium harrier t10, 1 would lead to a asymetrical loadout which would kinda mess with the performance
This copy-pasting of the base Phantom models needs to stop bro…
F-4E AUP (Greek Subtree) has the wrong centerline drop tank. The Greeks use the late-model F-15-style drop tank, not the early-style 600-gallon one…
Plus, another AMRAAM-carrying Phantom for a non-US nation. When are we getting the F-4E Terminator 2020? It better not go to Italy.
who else would it go too?
Does a US-operated AIM-120-capable Phantom exist…?
Then it might happen.
When Turkish tech tree be added, either as a sub-tree or an independent one. Then we will get it.
Does a US-operated AIM-120-capable Phantom exist…?
Then it might happen.
No, sadly. But US desparately needs a late model Phantom to fill the tech tree gap. Maybe not AMRAAM, but AIM-7M or something…
When Turkish tech tree be added, either as a sub-tree or an independent one. Then we will get it.
I sure hope a Turkish subtree goes to US or something. I for sure thought we’d get the Greek one since we already had the Greek AH-64… but noooo…
I just want a late model Phantom in the only tech tree I’ve grinded so far. I don’t want to have to play another nation to play more Phantoms…
yeah, the only reason why i’m playing israil is for the US stuff, So the Magachs, A-4s, (maybe) Machbets, and F-4s, and as of now, the SB2C-5
Hopefully not, USA and SU are already 2 biggest nations with a lot of potential vehicles to add, they obviously don’t need any subtree.
We sure as hell need a late model Phantom lmao
