It’s a fantastic vehicle, what do you mean? The firepower is incredible- the HE nukes everything and there’s APHE for noobs. All you’ve got to do is just not sit in the open letting everyone shoot you while you reload- while related the KV-1 and KV-2 are very different vehicles. Asking for it to move down just doesn’t make any sense. It’s probably just not the vehicle for you.
3 Likes
Mfw F-16 and Leopard 2
kv 2, fun ?
Wait. HESH.
1 Like
Cope lol, no the shells are still there, however they were changed from AC to Saphe, which is the same and the penetration was calculated, like EVERY OTHER gun, its nothing unique.
Skill Issue. The KV-2 is fine. Just don’t miss and lob the HE accordingly and you’ll net a kill every time you fire.
Unless you get Gaijin’d, anyways.
1 Like
The Tiger. No??
You take the KV-2 I’ll take a 2.0 Panzer to prove my point 😂
Stop lying, there’s sherman 105 that was 2.7 and now moved to 3.0 and panzer IV F&G at 3.3 that can one shot the turret no matter how you angle and you tell it’s fine as it is at 3.7 wow
Yeah. Some tanks can pen it. Its still not a bad tank.
Apples and oranges. Funny how you refuse to pull a comparison to other heavy tanks, let alone any other Derp cannon tank. Just proves you don’t have a good argument for your position.
1 Like
every tank has armor weaknesses dog, it came free with the armor profile
of you can’t deal with a tiger than that’s really your fault
KV-1E, KV-1B, 105mm Sherman:
1 Like
Wdym every time i play the tiger, the enemy are just free kills
Is that how it works? After I list so many good arguments you say that I didn’t list anything? 😂 This is a discussion I created for the purpose of calibrating a battle rating for one tank and make the experience BETTER for everyone, related to the battle rating itself specifically. After I’ve got 10-15 kills consistently in tanks around the 3.7 range, something that would be impossible in the KV2 just because of the reload, I think it’s fair to say that the KV2 is not equal in performance to those tanks. And if you say that it’s not supposed to perform, then why put a BR system in the first place, let’s just make ww1 tanks fight T90M “for the memes” . I listed the Sherman 105 that was put to 3.0 that is practically armoured similarly, good mobility, 3 times quicker reload, 50cal, smoke shells, with a lower profile (a hard to penetrate well angled turret). I don’t see why listing how other heavy tanks perform would be relevant, but you probably just want to make this discussion irrelevant. Anyway, the 3.7 KV1 has the same hull armour but 4 times faster reload with a cannon that does well for the BR, and a bouncy, low profile turret. There’s the 4.0 medium sherman and T34E that I got 15 kills with in an uptier after I stopped playing war thunder for 3 years. There’s no amount of “hiding after shooting” you can do with the KV2 to get those results. The only way to play it currently is shoot once, hide, look outside for half a minute, then shoot again. As a bonus the HE sometimes gets eaten by a track or MG. Why would this be the only way to play this heavy tank, and why would this heavy tank’s armour be obsolete against enemies it faces at the same BR or lower.
TLDR the KV-2 is fine where it is currently regarding it’s BR and needs no changes. Your arguments are whack. Simple as.
1 Like
Tbh, I respectfully disagree with you. I think (unless it is historically accurate) the KV-2’s reload should be shorted.
What if I told you it’s already artificially shortened?
2 Likes
Then it should be shorted again lol
Yeah, no.
1 Like