Is it unreasonable for the US to not get anything for one update ?
Answer
No it’s not, in fact it should be the norm for an update or two without getting anything.
1 Like
Not really. I think both US and USSR should have a jet in every two updates.
UK, France and China should have 2 in a year
Does not necessarily have to be top tier
It was mainly a joke but yeah Quartas US fetish kinda needs to stop a bit
1 Like
US should be getting something every update, because there is enough stuff left to add that they won’t run out of additions for a long time
Not how the game works and should never be how it works, Britain has now got two subs and a Commonwealth pool, so like it or not Britain therefore should have this right as well as other nations with subs
2 Likes
When did I say other trees couldn’t get stuff every update?
In your head, I can read your thoughts
The M1A1 FEP would have good thermals in general but worse armor than the SEPv2. The M1A1 SA has the armor level of the M1A2 SEPv2 and many of the features of the FEP. They both should be added.
Two versions of the FEP can come, one with Trophy and one without it.
Would be nice if all nations could get some stuff every update… tbh in my opinion gaijin should make major updates at a much lower rate (once per 9 or 12 monthes), but make the updates much bigger, more complete and balanced out. For example, instead of a small set of nations dominating the top br for few updates until the others get their equivalents, everyone gets their top tier jet at the same time. That also allows an easier decompression
3 Likes
US can easily get an aesa f-16/f-15c/e/fa18c and it would still be worse than rafale
1 Like
agreed, we know they are capable of pumping out tons of content. if they had to make it 50/50 because they can’t quite make enough that would be fine too.
That’s way too long, we’ll have to agree to disagree because I’m not going to change my mind about that
1 Like
Never understood why they give Israel 1 vehicle per update. Just finish out the tech tree, so when they inevitably go to add a new nation, they don’t have to spend more resources trying to give new stuff to 11 nations every update.
Who cares.
2 Likes
that would be too low. IMO they should expend their crew, Gaijin is still really a small company, and seems they haven’t expend the Warthunder team much for long time.
1 vehicle per update is already optimistic lol.
1 Like
I respect that, I just personally prefer less updates but more complete and squared up over a stream of stuff that is added fast for the sake of it and compensated later. I’ve also observed that the healthiest game communities I’ve been part of had a dev philosophy of building the updates properly and releasing only when it’s really ready, and taking their time
2 Likes
Right now I think missile/seeker fixes and lots of small additions to a simple upgrade like AESA F-15C would bring it sufficiently on par. Fixed seeker 120C-5 with BOL, SNIPER ATP A2A or LEGION IRST, and AESA on the F-15C seems like it would be very nice to play
Honestly, I’d rather get no content in an update, than getting an update where you only add one vehicle to a nation, and it’s a premium one.
They said they want to add new nations the new Norwegian Mossie and now the Canadian Spit have opened the doors for a whole host of new vehicles where previously they be wouldn’t even dreamed of being added.